Dispute over Greifenburg: bypass endangers nature and habitats!

Transparenz: Redaktionell erstellt und geprüft.
Veröffentlicht am

Awelt expert warns of the risks of the planned bypass. Citizens' initiative demands alternatives and discusses expropriations.

Umweltexperte warnt vor Risiken der geplanten Umfahrung Greifenburg. Bürgerinitiative fordert Alternativen und diskutiert Enteignungen.
Awelt expert warns of the risks of the planned bypass. Citizens' initiative demands alternatives and discusses expropriations.

Dispute over Greifenburg: bypass endangers nature and habitats!

The planned bypass of Greifenburg is currently causing violent discussions. On June 2, 2025, a press conference from the “Habitat Oberes Drautal” Habitat Initiative took place, in which numerous residents and landowners made their concerns aware of their concerns. Airisting expert Robert unbelieved warned of the negative ecological effects that a construction start this year could bring. According to the statements of the citizens' initiative, there is agreement on the need for a traffic solution, but there is disagreement with regard to the actual design of the bypass, which leads through a flood area of ​​the Drau and could thus increase the risk of flood. This information was prepared by dolomitenstadt.at.

Michael Dünhofen, chairman of the citizens' initiative and several farmers were also present at the press conference. Together they excluded a construction start this year, since two legal proceedings are currently taking place, the outcome of which should initially be seen. They criticize the non -transparent approach of the Carinthian state government and make it clear that up to 100 residents are affected by impending expropriations. The planned road, which is supposed to be around seven kilometers long, has the goal of relieving the town centers along Drautalstrasse (B 100), but there are concerns that the bypass of the region will not benefit economically. This is also emphasized by landowners Günter Emberger, whose existence could be threatened by the intervention, reports [Kleinezeitung.at] (https://www.kleinezeitung.at/kaernten/oberkaernten/19752489/dieser interventions-Wuerde-existenz-drohen).

Inadequate environmental compatibility

The citizens' initiative calls for an alternative route to protect valuable natural areas. Unlubited his concerns about sealing more than seven hectares of soil, which would result in massive interventions in nature. The planned bypass also provides for a double -storey roundabout that could not only affect the landscape, but also leads through the entry lane for paragliders. These are personal concerns that were raised by residents Herwig Leitner.

The activities of the citizens' initiative are part of a larger trend that is supported by organizations such as GSV e.V. This non -profit organization from Germany is committed to sustainable and environmentally friendly improvements in traffic conditions. The aim is to improve the quality of life and living for residents and optimize the traffic facilities. The minimization of interventions in nature and resource -saving construction processes is also paid to the minimization. The GSV e.V. advises citizens and offers help for local political mandate holders, which could also be important in this case. Further information can be found on the website of the GSV e.V..

The discussions about the Greifenburg bypass are symptomatic of the challenges that can occur in the planning and implementation of infrastructure projects. While the need for traffic solutions is often undisputed, the questions about the ecological consequences and the consent of the affected population remain of central importance.

Quellen: