Suche
Mein Konto
Criticism of surveillance plans: freedom and data protection at risk!
The Freedom Party and the Greens criticize the government's surveillance proposal in the Interior Committee. Concerns about fundamental rights and abuse.
Criticism of surveillance plans: freedom and data protection at risk!
In today's Interior Committee there was clear criticism of the government's proposal for monitoring messengers and potential threats. The FPÖ security spokesman Gernot Darmann described the measures as a “disproportionate encroachment on fundamental rights”. He recalled that the planned regulation had already been heavily criticized in the review process. Green MP Süleyman Zorba also expressed concerns and warned of possible opportunities for abuse that have occurred in countries with similar surveillance measures. He congratulated the ÖVP for dissuading its coalition partners from the principles. SPÖ and NEOS had previously spoken out against the use of “spy software”.
The planned legislation is intended to protect against serious attacks that threaten the constitution and is subject to strict legal and technical control requirements. A multi-level legal protection system with the Federal Administrative Court (BVwG) and independent legal protection officers is planned. Within the NEOS, numerous MPs have also spoken out against the regulation, including constitutional spokesman Nikolaus Scherak and MP Stephanie Krisper.
Monitoring and digitalization
The current discussion about surveillance is not an isolated issue. Rather, it reflects general developments in Germany, where digitalization has led to increased surveillance by state institutions. In particular, new police laws enable the use of state trojans for digital espionage, the expansion of video surveillance and the testing of facial recognition software. Preventive telecommunications surveillance, which can be carried out without any specific suspicion, is also part of these regulations. However, this poses risks for civil rights, as vague definitions such as “imminent danger” could lead to abuse and misinterpretation, experts warn.
Civil society protests from civil rights organizations and data protection advocates are increasing. These organizations oppose the expansion of state surveillance and are suing against measures such as state trojans. The Federal Constitutional Court has stopped government interference in privacy in the past, but the balance between security and freedom remains a central social debate.
Legal situation and challenges
In Germany, surveillance laws are controversial because they affect data protection and individual freedoms. Important laws are the Federal Constitutional Protection Act, the Federal Intelligence Service Act and the Foreign-Foreign Telecommunications Intelligence Act, which each lay down certain regulations for surveillance. Critics complain that the laws are too broad and do not adequately protect fundamental rights. Still, advocates emphasize the need for surveillance to ensure public safety.
Technological advances, particularly in the area of digital surveillance, pose new challenges. A 2018 study shows that knowledge of surveillance can change people's behavior. Furthermore, the data protection issues caused by the massive collection of data without specific suspicion raise concerns. The future of surveillance laws remains uncertain and will depend heavily on political resistance, social debates and technological developments.