Neurosurgeon in court: patient loses eye after operation!

Transparenz: Redaktionell erstellt und geprüft.
Veröffentlicht am

Neurosurgeon in court in Lausanne: patient lost eye after skull operation. Accusation: inadequate information and forgery of documents.

Neurosurgeon in court: patient loses eye after operation!

In Lausanne, a neurosurgeon is under serious suspicion: He is accused of not adequately informing a patient about the risks during a skull operation, which led to irreversible injury to her right eye. The incident occurred in February 2015 when the woman, then in her 30s, underwent surgery to remove a lump under the top of her skull. Serious complications occurred during the procedure. Despite immediate treatment at an eye clinic, the eye could not be saved and the patient has since been wearing an eye prosthesis, which she is often unable to use permanently due to severe pain. Their quality of life has reportedly deteriorated drastically Today.at.

The allegation also includes falsifying the required consent form, which should have been signed before the operation. The surgeon said he acted out of panic when it became known the document was missing. The absence of this written consent is crucial as it ensures that the patient is informed of the risks. This was reinforced by the plaintiff, who argues that she was pressured into action just three days after the initial consultation, without having sufficient time to make an informed decision. This information was also provided by Watson picked up.

Legal consequences and procedures

The doctor faces serious charges, including grievous bodily harm through negligence and forgery. In addition to a prison sentence, the legal consequences could also include the loss of your professional license. An expert certified that the procedure was carried out technically correctly and that the complications were unforeseeable, but the question of the doctor's legal responsibility remains open. The court must now decide whether the surgeon can be held responsible for the lack of information and the subsequent falsification. The accused surgeon is presumed innocent until the verdict is reached.