Trump against Comey: shock anchor due to false statements and disabilities!
US judiciary files an indictment against ex-FBI director Comey for false statements and disability of a congress examination.

Trump against Comey: shock anchor due to false statements and disabilities!
On September 26, 2025, the US Ministry of Justice raised charges against former FBI director James Comey. The file comprises two main allegations: false statements and disability of a congress examination. In the event of a possible conviction, Comey threatens up to five years in prison. In an Instagram video, Comey explained that he was innocent and wanted a process to prove his innocence. His lawyer, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, also expressed himself confidently and referred to the possibility of rehabilitation in court. The indictment is widely regarded as part of President Donald Trump's retaliation campaign against his political opponents. Comey had previously been a goal of Trump's criticism and was released in 2017 after he is said to have treated the FBI examinations for the Russia contacts incorrectly.
The Ministry of Justice raised the allegation against Comey in the context of his statement during a hearing from the Senate Committee for Justice on September 30, 2020. Comey claimed that he had not passed on any information about the FBI examinations to the press. In a report by the Ministry of Justice in 2018, however, it was found that his deputy, Andrew McCabe, stated that Comey had authorized him to pass on such information. Trump, who described Comey as "one of the worst people who has ever seen this country", celebrated the indictment on social media.
Political dimension of the indictment
The indictment against Comey is a striking break with decades of standards that aim to protect US criminal prosecution authorities from political pressure. In particular, the decision of the newly appointed state prosecutor Lindsey Halligan, who brought the indictment, is considered problematic. Previous career prosecutors in their office expressed concerns about the feasibility of the case and created a memo that documented the lack of probability of charges. Halligan, who was only sworn in this week, was previously a consultant in the White House and personal lawyer of Trump. The indictment is understood in the political landscape as another sign of Trump's aggressive approach to his political enemies.
The charges were raised by a Grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia, which in this case assumes amazing responsibility, since it is the first indictment against a political opponent. Norm Eisen, an experienced lawyer, expressed serious concerns about the political motivation behind this indictment and described it as vengeful and unfounded. The accusations also resigned personal consequences for Comey, whose son -in -law, Troy Edwards, has resigned after the announcement as a public prosecutor.
outlook
James Comey's hearing in front of the US district judge Michael S. Nachmanoff is scheduled for October 9th. The case could have far -reaching implications for the political norms and independence of the judiciary in the United States. Comey, who seems to be strengthened by the political turbulence, remains determined to prove his innocence. The pressure from the White House to take legal steps against enemies will certainly continue to play a role in the coming weeks. The Ministry of Justice is not only investigating Comey, but also against other opponents of Trump, including Letitia James and John Bolton.
The political reactions to the indictment will shape public opinion and further development in this critical legal discussion. Against the background of a polarized political landscape, the events around James Comey can not only be important for him personally, but also for the integrity of the entire American legal system.