Gabard publishes Russia documents and accuses Obama of having fake intelligence

Gabard publishes Russia documents and accuses Obama of having fake intelligence

One day after the serious allegations of President Donald Trump against his predecessor Barack Obama on the treason regarding the secret service that Russia intervened in the 2016 election, the director of the national secret services, Tulsi Gabbard, published a highly sensitive congress report, which she described as further evidence for a "conspiracy as a high branch". This publication is part of a carefully elaborated strategy by Gabard and other Trump allies in order to undermine the FBI investigation into Russia and the assessment of the secret services about Russian election influence.

the released report and its meaning

The edited report, which was written by Republicans of the Republican of the House of Representatives during the first term of office, represents a further step in the multi -dimensional offensive. Gabbard claimed that the evidence she has published indicated directly to Obama as the person responsible for the production of this intelligence evaluation. "They knew that this would promote the constructed narrative that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help President Trump to victory," she said.

reactions from the Ministry of Justice

The Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that the Ministry of Justice has launched a special unit in order to evaluate the evidence published by Gabbard and to examine possible legal steps that could result from Gabard's disclosures. Gabard himself avoided to accuse Obama of the high tranquence and referred to the lawyers of the Ministry of Justice. Nevertheless, she did not rule out that the former president was involved in the intelligence deception.

The controversy about secret service information

Democrats accused Gabard of endangering sensitive intelligence sources and methods by publishing the report. Senator Mark Warner , the Supreme Democrat in the Senate Secret Service Show, expressed: "The desperate and irresponsible publication of the party report of the intelligence agency brings some of the most sensitive sources and methods of our secret services that investigate against Russia."

Gabard's political position

Gabard's decision to publish the report when several predecessors had rejected this questions their position within the Trump administration. There were reports that Trump publicly questioned Gabard's assessment of Iran's nuclear skills and was not present at an important meeting about Israel and Iran.

future of intelligence operations

A former high-ranking US secretary employee expressed concern about the uninterrupted materials remaining in the report, which Moscow is collected in the way in the way intelligence information could be collected and represent possible dangers to sources. "It should also scare all of our sources who report on politically unpleasant issues," said the official who added: "If I were, I would withdraw now."

summary of reporting

The report offers a detailed insight into the original intelligence information that was used to create the 2017 analysis. He accuses the executives of the secret service of the Obama administration secret service to have rely on poorly sound and not confirmed information in order to conclude that Putin Trump prefers. In the analysis, it is underlined that the discrepancy between the individual secret services with regard to their level of trust was due to the different access to information.

conclusion: The ongoing discussions and controversy relating to secret service evaluation and the following political impulses show how strong the tensions between the different parties and the intelligence structures are. The events related to the publication of Gabard and the reactions to this will continue to be seen as a key topic in the political landscape of the United States.