Vienna deletes training surcharge: Danger for the future of the needy!
Vienna deletes training surcharge: Danger for the future of the needy!
Wien, Österreich - Vienna has announced that the increased training surcharge on June 30th. This measure primarily affects social welfare educators: inside that visit longer AMS training. The training surcharge was an important financial support, the people concerned helped expand their knowledge and thus improve the opportunities on the labor market. David Ellensohn, the social spokesman for the Vienna Greens, expressed serious concerns about the deletion and warned that this could significantly restrict the future prospects of the data subjects. He explains that such a decision will possibly keep people longer in the minimum security, which could also burden the AMS and social welfare budgets.
Markus Koza, social spokesman for the Greens in the National Council, criticizes the abolition of the training surcharge as a socio -political and short -sighted policy. An impact assessment by the Ministry of Social Affairs shows that the savings due to the deletion of the training surcharge for social welfare educators are 17 million euros in the inside. Koza argues that they are well invested because they bring people into employment and thus secure additional income to the state. Both politicians emphasize that budget consolidation cannot be used as an excuse for the deletion of the training surcharge, especially not in view of other high expenditure of the Federal Government.
new regulations and educational bonus
At the same time, a novella for the Basic Social Assistance Act was decided in the National Council, which introduces an educational bonus for social welfare educators: inside. This educational bonus is almost 150 euros per month for training of at least four months and up to 300 euros for training courses that last longer than a year. In addition, an AMS allowance of 2.49 euros per day is granted. These measures aim to sustainably qualify people in minimum security in order to promote their return to the labor market. However, the SPÖ and NEOS voted against this amendment to the law because they expressed concerns about implementation and effectiveness.The deletion of the training surcharge is part of a number of changes in the social and professional environment. Additional training and support options are, for example, the vocational training measures (BVB), which convey practical and theoretical knowledge. These are carried out by educational institutions on behalf of the employment agency and usually last up to 12 months. They offer participants the opportunity to prepare for the acquisition of the secondary school leaving certificate.
effects on the labor market and future
The combination of the deletion of the training surcharge and the new regulations could have far -reaching consequences for those affected. The withdrawal of financial support in a phase in which people strive for qualification is considered a hindrance. Koza and Ellensohn emphasize that fundamental changes in labor market policy are needed to better integrate unemployed people long -term and improve their perspectives. Measures would have to be designed in such a way that they actually help instead of putting the stones concerned in the way.
Finally, it can be said that the developments around the training surcharge and the legal new regulations also represent problems and opportunities. The effort to better qualify could make a decisive difference through targeted financial support. The question remains how the people concerned will react to the new regulations without the training surcharge. The entire topic requires careful monitoring in order to be able to make the necessary adjustments in good time.
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Ort | Wien, Österreich |
| Quellen | |