Tip-up dispute: FPÖ and UNOS in the heat for taxation!

Tip-up dispute: FPÖ and UNOS in the heat for taxation!

In the debate about the tax -free of drinking money, a UNOS petition causes excitement. FPÖ tourism spokesman Christoph Steiner expresses sharp criticism of the Initiative, which calls for a tax exemption for drinking money. According to ots, UNOS federal spokesman Michael Bernhard has confirmed the clear position of the organization, while the FPÖ has rejected the application as an economy.

Steiner criticizes the posture of the NEOS after Bernhard had previously voted on drinking money against an FPÖ application for the 100 % freedom of tax. In a critical comment, Steiner describes this step as hypocrisy and announced that it would bring in another initiative for freedom of tax. "Fingers away from the tip!" He vehemently demands and emphasizes that tips as an expression of voluntary recognition should not result in any tax obligations [fpoe.at] (https://www.fpoe.at/medien/pressemeldungen/artikel/fpoe-steiner-neos-piholungs-und-anbiederung-scheinheilz-beim--thema-drinking

criticism from the trade union association

The topic is not only heavily discussed at the political level. The Austrian Trade Union Confederation (ÖGB) expresses concerns about a completely tax -free tip. The ÖGB argues that this could endanger the social security of the employees. Drinking money is often irregular and unpredictable, which can lead to uncertain income relationships. Instead of freedom of tax, the ÖGB calls for a fair remuneration and better working conditions for the employees in the catering trade, such as tirol.orf.at

UNOS has been characterized by the representation of liberal thinking entrepreneurs since 2014 and is active in various business parliaments. They hope for a trend reversal in FPÖ policy to receive constructive suggestions for the catering and service sector. The petition for freedom of tax can be signed online at www.unos.eu/mitmachen/petition-gutzenfreies-drink money.

reactions and outlook

The discussion about the treatment of drinking money and their taxation remains tense. Especially the answer from Steiner to the Neos and the participation of the unions in this dialogue show how complex and emotionally charged the topic is. The different views of the need for sources of income and social security are the focus of the debate and will also trigger numerous reactions in the coming weeks.