National Council: Second attempt at Pilnacek investigation gaining momentum!

Transparenz: Redaktionell erstellt und geprüft.
Veröffentlicht am

The National Council is again examining the establishment of a committee of inquiry into the Pilnacek case. Positive signals from coalition parties.

Der Nationalrat prüft erneut die Einsetzung eines Untersuchungsausschusses zum Fall Pilnacek. Positive Signale von Koalitionsparteien.
The National Council is again examining the establishment of a committee of inquiry into the Pilnacek case. Positive signals from coalition parties.

National Council: Second attempt at Pilnacek investigation gaining momentum!

On September 25, 2025, the establishment of a committee of inquiry into the Christian Pilnacek case in the National Council could now succeed in the second attempt. The first signs of possible approval by the coalition parties became visible during a debate in the National Council. The subject of the investigation proposed by the FPÖ is formulated more clearly, which increases the chances of successful implementation. The Rules Committee is now responsible for checking the formal correctness of the request, for which it has eight weeks.

In this debate, SPÖ MP Kai Jan Krainer emphasized that a judge should not be necessary for the investigation. NEOS MP Sophie Marie Wotschke, who classified the FPÖ request as “constitutional at first glance”, also signaled optimism. However, your party, together with the SPÖ, leaves a loophole open, while ÖVP MP Andreas Hanger would like to clarify further detailed questions.

Subject of investigation and time frame

The FPÖ is pushing for a speedy investigation, particularly with regard to the circumstances of Pilnacek's death and the associated investigations. There are allegations such as unauthorized removal of evidence and pressure on journalists. Krainer was pleasantly surprised by the clear delineation of the subject of the investigation, while Hanger emphasized the need for a clear definition.

The Green MP Nina Tomaselli has asked that the deadlines not be exhausted and that educational work begin as quickly as possible. The Rules Committee must also begin its deliberations within four weeks. If the FPÖ's application is approved, the committee will also be responsible for making the basic evidentiary decision and determining the positions of the procedural judges and lawyers.

Historical context and legal basis

The legal framework for the establishment of investigative committees in the National Council is clearly defined. This instrument of parliamentary control can be initiated by a minority resolution supported by a quarter of the MPs. In the Second Republic, there have been 29 committees of inquiry to date, seven of which were set up at the request of a minority, underlining the importance of such procedures.

In the current case, the investigation will also concern suspected unlawful actions in the late Pilnacek's environment. The FPÖ sees it as a duty of the National Council to clarify these allegations, and if the Rules Committee agrees, the next meeting of the National Council on October 15th will be decisive for the further course of events.

In summary, the second attempt to establish a committee of inquiry into the Christian Pilnacek case presents both opportunities and challenges, with the political response and legal framework being crucial.

For further information on current developments in the National Council, visit the website OTS, parliament.gv.at and parliament.gv.at.