Social welfare reform: Greens warn of unconstitutional waiting periods!

Social welfare reform: Greens warn of unconstitutional waiting periods!

Laimgrubengasse 10, 1060 Wien, Österreich - The discussion about reforms in social assistance in Austria is vehemently unfolding. The Greens, led by their social spokesman Markus Koza, are behind a serious standardization of social assistance. Koza emphasizes the need for the labor market service (AMS) to be responsible for all employable persons, while at the same time alternative responsibilities for particularly protective groups, such as the approximately 10,000 recipients: inside in retirement age and people with disabilities, have to be established. Such measures are intended to prevent bureaucratic hurdles from maintaining people from receiving help. Koza also warns of the government's planned waiting periods, which according to expert opinions, including the fiscal council chairman Christoph Badelt, may be unconstitutional. These deadlines could lead to people in need, such as victims of violence, and would therefore directly object to the legal and social goal of social assistance, which calls the fight against poverty.

In the meantime, the ÖVP has another five -year waiting period for foreigners: on the inside, which is categorically rejected by the Greens. The criticism aims at the fact that the unclear definition of the social benefits that the ÖVP thinks could lead to an unequal treatment of entitlements. Experts are skeptical about the legal feasibility of these proposals, since they are classified as discriminatory and unconstitutional. These demands could have serious effects on the integration and social participation of refugee people. In addition, an aggravation of access to social assistance would also endanger health care, since many asylum seekers: in the inside, generally cannot do any gainful employment and at the same time depend on social assistance. The idea of a waiting period not only appears unethical, but counterproductive for social integration.

health perspectives and integration

The risk of health due to the exclusion of asylum enthusiasts from social assistance is also criticized. If these people were living without financial security for years, health problems could impose themselves, which subsequently endanger society. Access to health care is of central importance for all, especially poor people, to prevent the spread of diseases. An isolated view of the social welfare system, which only aims at monetization, could be fatal and necessarily leads to an increase in poverty and social inequality.

The Green Group are ready for constructive discussions on the further development of the social system, but they decide to reject harmful plans that would continue to holy the social network. A common goal would be not only to reduce the bureaucratic hurdles, but also to improve the quality of life for all sides in order to counteract increasing social injustice, such as Markuskoza.at This topic remains equally explosive, since the ÖVP aggressively acts against immigration into the social system and the voices of experts and political competitors are loud that such a policy could endanger Austria's social stability, as well as ots.at noticed.