Citizens' decision on the Lower Rhine: Does the Reichswald save the national park?

Citizens' decision on the Lower Rhine: Does the Reichswald save the national park?

Kleve, Deutschland - North Rhine-Westphalia Citizens' decision as the last chance for the National Park

A dramatic turning point for nature conservation in North Rhine-Westphalia is imminent! In the district of Kleve, the citizens' decision on the creation of a second national park will soon begin. 265,000 citizens receive the postal voting documents and have the opportunity to vote until mid -December. A clear no could finally bury the project, which is primarily promoted by the Greens. Time is urging, because the decision could be the last chance for the national park!

why the Lower Rhine?

The Klever Reichswald, the largest coherent forest area on the Lower Rhine, is the focus. There were originally six locations in the race, but all others were rejected. Local politics, especially the CDU and FDP, stood against the plans while the Greens and the SPD were for the national park. Now only the Reichswald, which is the potential location for the second national park in NRW. Environment Minister Oliver Krischer emphasizes the urgency: Almost every second animal and plant species in the country is at risk!

What happens in the vote?

The district council has already voted against the national park with a majority, but 17,000 signatures for a citizens' request have forced the decision. In order to approve the national park, the supporters have to overcome two hurdles: a majority of votes and a turnout of at least 15 percent. This means that at least 39,750 yes votes are necessary! If the majority vote for the national park, Kleve could apply as a location in the state. However, the project would finally end a no, even if Krischer assures that the door remains open to other regions.

The decision about the national park could not only influence nature, but also the local economy. Critics warn of possible restrictions that could affect forestry and drinking water supply. But time is urged and the citizens now have to decide whether they want to vote for the protection of biodiversity and the creation of a new national park!