Selenskyj: Fights continue despite Putin's fire break!

Selenskyj: Fights continue despite Putin's fire break!

Vienna, Österreich - On April 20, 2025, the situation on the front between Russia and Ukraine remains tense. The Ukrainian President Wolodymyr Selenskyj reported on continuing struggles on Russian soil, although a 30-hour break was announced by Kremlin chief Vladimir Putin. This break is said to last until midnight on Easter Sunday, but the fights in the Russian border regions of Kursk and Belgorod are still intensive because Ukraine is doing military advances there.

Selenskyj admits that the situation has calmed down in some areas. Nevertheless, he adds, the Russian attacks continue in the affected regions and Ukrainian military information is currently not independent. In Ukraine, the Russian artillery remains active on many front sections, and the use of drones can still be observed.

fire break and military developments

Selenskyj underlines the willingness of Ukraine to an unconditional 30-day break and calls on the international community to evaluate the reduction of the intensity and brutality of the attacks to find out who is really responsible for the war. In a statement, the president expects new information from the front at night, which will provide information about the current status of the fights.

Putin's announced fire break serves to temporarily contain the military conflicts, but the reality on the front seems to overlap the announcement. The Ukrainian forces continue their operational efforts, while the use of Russian artillery and drones is ongoing despite the announced ceasefire.

western perspectives and possible scenarios

The western governments had long assessed the resilience of Ukraine as low. Before the fights began, NATO and the EU believed that Ukraine would result in Russia in the event of an attack. This misjudgment caused no weapon deliveries to Ukraine at the beginning of the conflict. The then Federal Minister Robert Habeck confirmed that Germany would not deliver weapons to Ukraine, which reflected a cross -party consensus that was justified by pacifist considerations and economic interests.

Three scenarios are currently being discussed that could affect the possible course of the war and its termination: a Russian victory, a peace of negotiation through exhaustion or even the decline in regime in Russia. The latter could be brought about through internal tensions and economic difficulties and could enable sustainable peace in the long term.

The conflict remains a far -reaching geopolitical problem that has both military and social implications far beyond Ukraine. The international community faces the challenge of finding answers to the questions that arise from the unsolved location.

For more information on the complex background and options for action of the West, take a look at the analysis of bpb.de illuminated.

For the latest developments and reports from Ukraine, visit vienna.at , where the current events and reactions are summarized by the political leader.