Kickl surprisingly withdraws – what’s behind it?

Transparenz: Redaktionell erstellt und geprüft.
Veröffentlicht am

Herbert Kickl, FPÖ leader, is stepping into the background for family reasons. Withdrawal causes unrest in politics.

Herbert Kickl, FPÖ-Chef, tritt aus familiären Gründen in den Hintergrund. Rückzug sorgt für Unruhe in der Politik.
Herbert Kickl, FPÖ leader, is stepping into the background for family reasons. Withdrawal causes unrest in politics.

Kickl surprisingly withdraws – what’s behind it?

The federal party chairman of the FPÖ, Herbert Kickl, has surprisingly canceled all public appointments and is withdrawing from the public. The Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) announced that this withdrawal was due to family reasons. Concrete details about the circumstances have not yet been published. Kickl is therefore unable to attend the upcoming state party conference of the Styrian FPÖ, where the re-election of Mario Kunasek is up for discussion, as well as attending the Wieselburg Folk Festival. However, according to reports from the Austrian media, he is expected back by the next National Council meeting on July 9th at the latest, which is leading to speculation about the possible consequences of his resignation.

In its announcement, which is considered surprising, the FPÖ withheld further information. Many are watching the situation with concern, particularly with regard to the impact on political negotiations and internal party leadership. Kickl himself has not yet commented on his withdrawal and is inactive on his social media channels. It also remains unclear whether health factors are behind this sudden decision.

Political unrest and speculation

The cancellation of Kickl's appointments is causing unrest in the Austrian political landscape. His absence comes amid ongoing discussions within the FPÖ and could put the party in a difficult position. So far there is no detailed information from Kickl's inner circle. The FPÖ's manner of communication, which is perceived as atypical, leaves room for speculation about the reasons and possible effects of its withdrawal.
Cosmo reports that the FPÖ has not commented on possible negotiations or internal processes, which further increases the uncertainty.

In the context of resignations in politics, Kickl's case does not remain isolated. For example, Michael Lindner, SPÖ regional councilor in Upper Austria, recently announced his resignation in order to be able to look after his sons more intensively. Lindner emphasized that witnessing his sons' childhood and the challenges that arise with balancing family and work are his top priority. He justifies his withdrawal, among other things, by saying that in politics it is rare for fathers to put their careers aside in favor of their family, a strong sign in the current political debate.
Day one further explains that the gender pay gap in Austria is still worryingly high and that there is a lack of framework conditions for parents in politics.

These developments focus on the challenges of balancing politics and personal life and raise questions that affect both the FPÖ and the SPÖ. The political landscape in Austria is faced with the task of respecting such personal decisions while at the same time creating the necessary structures to enable a balanced relationship between career and family life.