The best roof boxes in the test: security meets functionality!
The best roof boxes in the test: security meets functionality!
Lagos, Portugal - It is the large roof box test 2024, which now clearly shows drivers which model is suitable for the perfect skiing holiday! According to a comprehensive test of the ÖAMTC, which took a close look at 13 different roof boxes, the Audi model is ahead. The testers particularly praised the excellent driving characteristics and security in critical situations. With a price between 300 and 900 euros, buying a roof box can be a real challenge, but not every expensive box is also the best choice, as the test impressively proves. The ÖAMTC pointed out that the correct assembly and securing of the box is crucial to avoid dangerous situations in road traffic, as ÖAMTC technician Steffan Kerbl emphasizes.
The best models in comparison
Consequently, the "Motion 3 XL Low" from Thule ranks second place, which is also sold by Audi under its own branding. These successes underline the high quality and security that Thule offers. In third place is the Mercedes "Dachbox M", which convinces in the high -priced segment. Much cheaper alternatives, such as the products from HaPro and Kame, also cut off well and show that you don't always have to dig deep into your pocket to maintain safety and quality.
A drop of bitterness is the "Dachbox 420" from BMW, which scores with good processing, but places high assembly requirements for the user. The weaker models, such as the "Evospace Tefxl" from Northline, failed at the crash test and could be a great danger in the event of an accident. It is obvious that security should be in the first place when choosing the right roof box, while the price is not the only decisive factor, as can be read on Surfbox.de
If you are looking for a roof box, you should first find out about the test results to make the best decision. High -quality workmanship, simple handling and suitable security features are crucial to get the slopes safely.
Details | |
---|---|
Ort | Lagos, Portugal |
Quellen |
Kommentare (0)