Despite violence: Why Meidling does without video surveillance

Despite violence: Why Meidling does without video surveillance

In the middle of growing concern about the security in the vicinity of the Meidling station, a recent series of violence has raised questions about the effectiveness and need for video surveillance. In July there was a bloody gang fight there, in which several people were seriously injured. The situation escalated in a knife attack that took four people to the hospital in a critical condition and even required a helicopter to get a medical evacuation.

Despite these frightening incidents that endangered public security, the official answer to the demands for increased security measures such as video surveillance has attracted critical attention. Many citizens wonder how it is possible that, according to such a violent discussion, no corresponding measures are taken. Why is video surveillance dispensed with despite the danger situation?

The reaction of the authorities

The decision not to install video surveillance systems remains incomprehensible to many, especially at a time when security in public locations is increasingly priority. The authorities argue that various factors must be taken into account when evaluating such measures, including the costs and the effects on the privacy of citizens. However, these explanations often encounter skepticism.

The discussion about the need for security cameras gains urgency, especially since such incidents put a great burden on the feeling of security of the residents. Similar incidents in the past have shown that video surveillance has a preventive effect and can help reduce crime and to provide evidence of the investigation of criminal offenses.

For further information on the incident and the ongoing debates about security measures in Meidling, See the current reporting at www.krone.at