Dispute over Dreierspitze: Chancellor Stocker defends judicial reform!

Dispute over Dreierspitze: Chancellor Stocker defends judicial reform!

The Chancellor Christian Stocker (ÖVP) defended the plans for the introduction of a triple tip in the federal prosecutor. In a current statement, he described this model as "a variant with which I can live". At the same time, Vice Chancellor Andreas Babler (SPÖ) asked for patience because the exact designs still have to be discussed. According to the planned draft, a “fundamentally equal threesome committee” is to be installed at the head of the public prosecutor. The committee of the committee is nine years and the chair should change every three years. The occupation is made by experienced prosecutors, prosecutors and judges with at least ten years of experience in criminal law.

While the government adheres to the new concept, the President of the Supreme Court, Georg Kodek, expresses considerable concerns. He criticizes the "hasty definition" to a multi -headed management body and describes the solution as "almost singular" in an international comparison. Kodek questions whether the creation of an expensive structures, especially in view of the current budget, is really necessary. "It is unfortunate that you choose a three -senate," emphasizes Kodek, who also indicates the risk of further political influence.

criticism from various parties

Stocker and Babler rejected Kodek's budget argument. The Federal Chancellor emphasized that the decision of political nature and not economically motivated. Foreign Minister Beate Meinl-Reisinger (NEOS) also expressed concerns by clarifying that she could not understand the budget argument. It emphasizes the value of decoupling the peak of instructions from politics. BABLER, on the other hand, rated CODEK's opinion as one of many, which further sparked the discussion about the reform.

In addition to the criticism of Kodek, Margit Wachberger, the head of the general power of attorney, also expressed concerns. It calls for a separation of the management of the authority from the Dreierenat and sees positive aspects in creating an independent and instruction -free public prosecutor's head and the inclusion of experienced experts.

milestone or problematic reform?

The design of the new state prosecutor is considered a possible milestone by many Justice experts. However, they emphasize that practical implementation will be decisive. The association of the prosecutors is skeptical about planned constant control by the parliament, which is intended in government agencies. Prosecutor President Elena Haslinger criticizes the transparency in the voting behavior and argues that this is subject to the idea of ​​a collegial organ.

The concerns about exuberant reporting obligations and political influence also remain a central topic. The previous chain of instructions, which ends with the Minister of Justice or the Minister of Justice, has triggered massive criticism both nationally and internationally. The EU Commission has already pointed out this problem in the legal state report.

Overall, the discussion about the reform of the federal prosecutor remains exciting, since both political and professional voices have to be heard in the coming weeks and months. However, the next decision of the Council of Ministers on the establishment of the federal prosecutor is already on Wednesday, which may be another turning point in this controversial topic.