Catalog of penalties: How coaches feel about harsher sanctions!

Catalog of penalties: How coaches feel about harsher sanctions!

Current discussions about sanctioning misconduct in football reveal a clear shift in attitude among coaches at domestic clubs. WAC coach Didi Kühbauer said in a “Krone” survey that he was not necessarily a fan of penalties. Still, he acknowledges that disciplinary action may be necessary for serious violations. “I'm not a fan of punishments, to be honest, but of course there are penalties for being late or for ringing on a cell phone while eating,” says Kühbauer. These views raise important questions about the need for clear regulations and possible consequences, particularly at a time when demands for professionalism and responsibility are growing.

At the same time, the legal discussion deals with the measures in criminal law that are anchored in the German Criminal Code (StGB). These measures have been criticized as state responses to crimes, particularly with regard to the fair education and rehabilitation of perpetrators. Loud Law Forum These measures include, among other things, the “measure of correction and security”, which serves to protect the general public from further crimes. Perpetrators can be placed in rehabilitation centers if their crimes are directly related to addictive behavior.

Preventive and repressive measures

The discussion about punishments and measures goes from the football fields to the courtrooms. The legal sanctions set out in Section 11 Paragraph 1 No. 8 StGB show how versatile and differentiated criminal law works. In addition to rehabilitation, there are also measures such as forfeiture and confiscation of assets related to crime. These aspects underline the relevance of regulations that are intended to fulfill both preventative and repressive purposes. These considerations make it clear that the question of the right sanctions is of central importance not only in football, but also in the area of ​​criminal law.