Söder's kneeling in Warsaw: respect or self-dramatization?
Markus Söder is criticized for kneeling in Warsaw. Claudia Roth described his behavior as “absolute rock bottom”.
Söder's kneeling in Warsaw: respect or self-dramatization?
Bavaria's Prime Minister Markus Söder (CSU) is facing considerable criticism after his controversial kneeling in front of the Warsaw Ghetto Heroes Monument in Warsaw. Söder took one knee there as a sign of respect, 54 years after Willy Brandt's symbolic kneel. However, Söder's gesture is strongly condemned by leading politicians such as former Federal Finance Minister Peer Steinbrück (SPD) and Minister of State for Culture Claudia Roth (Greens). According to Steinbrück, Söder's behavior is among the greatest bad taste that he has experienced from a German politician in recent years. He described the gesture as a trivialization of politics and noted that “some synapses are not wired correctly” in the Prime Minister, as he explained in an ARD broadcast.
The kneeling, which took place on December 7th, resulted shortly afterwards in a picture of Söder with a bratwurst at a Christmas market in Warsaw. This left many with the impression that it was just a staged photo op. Claudia Roth spoke of an “absolute low point” and emphasized that the gesture in memory of Willy Brandt was undeserving. She expressed that Söder's behavior lacked the necessary seriousness and described the depiction of the sausage as a "social media fun fact". The state and political reactions to Söder's appearance demonstrate a deep aversion to the supposed frivolity with which he treats these serious issues.
The emotional polarization surrounding Söder's gesture is reflected in the public discourse and shows how sensitive the issue of political responsibility still is in Germany. Beyond the media outrage, it is clear that such actions not only provoke political reactions but can also influence the perception of history. Söder has defended himself against the allegations and sees the criticism of his kneeling as disrespectful and inappropriate in the face of the Jewish population. These controversies could further tarnish the image of the Bavarian state government in the long term.
Söder himself announced in the “Tagesthemen” that it was a personal concern of his to commemorate the victims and show respect, which, in the eyes of his critics, he was not entitled to. The process shows how political actions are permeated by symbolism, and that dealing with this often leads to complex and delicate discussions, as in the case of Söder's controversial kneeling.
Already on December 17th, Söder commented on this topic in the “Maischberger” program and rejected the strong criticism as inappropriate BR.de reported. Other critical voices were also found in the reporting at the same time Welt.de hearing.