Fate of the pug lady Wilma”: Drama before the Higher Regional Court!

Fate of the pug lady Wilma”: Drama before the Higher Regional Court!

In a remarkable legal dispute that stirs emotions in and around Ahlen, the pug lady “Edda” is at the center. Today, at 11 a.m., the case will be heard before the Higher Regional Court (OLG) in Hamm. The dog owner, who purchased the pug from the city of Ahlen at the end of 2018, complains that several illnesses were not disclosed to the dog when it was sold.

This long-simmering dispute has attracted considerable attention, not least because of the dog's health problems at the time of the sale. The plaintiff is of the opinion that she was deliberately deceived during the purchase because the defects were not mentioned in the purchase offer. The situation has developed into a real legal case since 2018, which is now ending up on the legal stage of a higher authority.

Negotiation and amount in dispute

However, in April 2023, the buyer's first lawsuit before the Münster Regional Court was unsuccessful, which prompted her to appeal. The plaintiff not only demands compensation, but also that the city of Ahlen cover the future treatment costs for the dog. She estimates the value in dispute at around 19,000 euros, a sum that covers both the acquisition costs and future expenses for medical treatments.

During the hearing in Hamm, an expert who examined the dog and examined relevant documents relating to the complaints will be heard. The Higher Regional Court will examine the evidence presented and could possibly make a judgment today.

Interestingly, the lady dog ​​has now been given a new name and is called “Wilma” by her current owner. This name change is a phenomenon often observed when animals pass into new hands and could be symbolic of a new beginning.

The “Edda/Wilma” negotiations illustrate how important it is to receive complete and truthful information when purchasing pets. The outcome of this trial could have far-reaching consequences for similar cases in the future. Consumers could pay more attention to disclosure of animal welfare issues and sellers' responsibilities, particularly when it comes to pet health issues.

Today's negotiation could also be a signal to cities and municipalities about how they should proceed with the sale of animals in the future. The events surrounding “Edda” are an example of how the legal framework for animal protection and consumer protection intertwines and the influence such individual cases can have on society's perception of pet purchases.

Details of this litigation, which has dragged on for several years, continue to be of great interest to the public as it raises questions about the responsibility of sellers and the legal protection of buyers. The case is certainly being closely monitored by animal protection organizations, which keep an eye on the legal situation and the welfare of animals.

For a detailed look at the case and the current status of the negotiation, see the report on www.noz.de.