Landess in Vienna: 5 free drinks for FPÖ votes in court!

Landess in Vienna: 5 free drinks for FPÖ votes in court!

On June 25, 2025, a 60-year-old landlady from Floridsdorf at the Vienna Regional Court had to answer for "bribery in the event of an election". The background to this procedure is a Facebook post in which the landlady offered five free drinks for a vote voice of the FPÖ. The election morning pint on which the campaign was to take place was announced for April 27, the day of the Vienna election. The landlady stated that the action was meant as a "gag" and she wanted to celebrate a private election party.

As part of the process, the judge proposed a diversion, which means that the procedure was stopped at a two -year trial period. Although the landlady did not speak guilty in the criminal sense, she took responsibility for the incidents. Instead of a possible imprisonment of up to one year or a fine of 720 daily rates, she only had to pay flat -rate costs of 150 euros. The public prosecutor also accepted the diversion.

Details of the incident and diversion

In her Facebook post, which was also printed out and hung in the restaurant, the landlady asked the voters: "Show me a photo with the Kreuzerl in the right place and you get 5 free drinks." The "right position" referred to the FPÖ. On the election day itself, the restaurant recorded five to six guests, each consuming two to three beers. The judge found that offering free drinks was sufficient to justify criminal liability, but there was a parade infestation for a diversion because there was no greater damage. This corresponds to the provisions on the diversion in Austria, which are regulated in §§ 198 ff of the Austrian Code of Criminal Procedure.

diversion is an alternative reaction option of the state to crimes, with the aim of avoiding the need for a conviction. If the diversion is successful, the public prosecutor's office finally resigns from the persecution, which is advantageous for the accused. The approval of the diversion measure, which in this case includes payment of a sum of money, is always voluntary and serves to avoid a lengthy process. This is particularly relevant because the landlady emphasized that they have not seen any photos of ballot papers in the restaurant and that was also not wanted.

Dolomitenstadt reported that the landlady described this incident and emphasized that she learned from the Situation. The case caused controversial discussions about the limits of humor and the right to vote in political discourse.

In summary, it can be said that the case shows how keyful integrity can be endangered by careless statements on social media. emphasizes that despite the severity of the allegation, the landlady came from it with a low financial burden. The question remains whether this remains an isolated case or whether similar incidents increase in the future.

The legal framework for diversion is clearly regulated and offer an opportunity to avoid unjustified consequences for non -serious offenses. Information on the legal aspects can also be found at Law Experts