Misunderstanding or attack? Syrians on allegations in court hearing

Misunderstanding or attack? Syrians on allegations in court hearing

A court condemned an 18-year-old Syrian for sexual assault. The incidents occurred in the Vienna area, where the accused met in a context that was not described in more detail. The allegations are serious and the negotiations offer an insight into the events from the perspective of both parties.

The young man confessed to being intrusive in the situation, but vehemently defended himself. He stated that he had no bad intentions and thought that the girl was also interested. "I thought she wanted that too. I confused things. We probably just misunderstood ourselves," he said at the meeting. However, the legal must be rejected significantly.

The reaction of the accused

Although he admitted to being more than polite in the situation, the accused rejected the actual allegations. So he noticed the prosecutor's statement that the girl "break!" And "Stop it!" I said: "I didn't fuck her." With another argument, he tried to underpin his position by explaining that the girl had told him that she was 16 years old. If he had known the true age, in his opinion it would never have occurred to this meeting.

The court saw things differently and expressed a judgment. The convict was sentenced to a conditional prison sentence of six months, which means that he does not have to compete with the punishment as long as he does not commit any new crimes during the probation period. This brings the question of the air conditioning of the legal consequences in such cases again.

The judgment is not only important for the accused, but also throws a light on the challenges associated with the legal assessment of sexual assault, especially for minors. It remains to be seen whether the case will have other legal aftermath and which reactions in society will follow the judgment. More details on this topic can be found in a detailed report at www.heute. .