Germany to Bismarck: climb, setbacks and economic perspectives

Germany to Bismarck: climb, setbacks and economic perspectives

The political landscape of Germany has experienced many twists in recent decades, but the roots of these developments go far back. In particular, the decisions and events after the end of the First World War and the challenges associated with the establishment of the German Empire shape today's reality. After the departure of Otto von Bismarck, the first Chancellor of the Empire, the decline of political and economic stability began that Germany had honored for a long time.

The way to the foundation of the German Empire on January 18, 1871 was not only a geopolitical step, but also the beginning of a complex relationship to the great powers in Europe. The slow national development of Germany compared to other countries of the continent was a central point that ultimately led to a dangerous undesirable development in the international structure.

The loss of political leadership

The decision of Kaiser Wilhelm II to discontinue Bismarck in 1890 was a turning point. The important reinsurance contract with Russia was then not extended, which led to a significant diplomatic failure. This decision weakened the German international positions because the connection to Russia and potential cooperation with other European powers were at risk. The result was an isolation of Germany in the political arena, while France and Russia formed and formed an alliance that was directed directly against the interests of Germany.

The decline in political skill was not the only problem. The economic foundations on which the Empire rested to the end were also shaken. Friedrich List, who is considered one of the most important economists in Germany, pursued an opposite line on the teaching of Adam Smith. While Smith advocates cosmopolitan economy, List emphasized the importance of a political national economy based on the specific needs and conditions of a country. List was convinced that the protection of its own industries is necessary to strengthen the national economy.

The effects on national identity

The turning away from these principles has brought Germany into a problematic location, especially after the takeover of Adam Smith's outer and internal economic model. Modern globalization and the model of free trade policy led to de -industrialization, which cost numerous jobs and undergrow the economic basis of the state. In recent years, many critics have observed that this process not only affects industry, but also endangered basic social structures.

The ideological overlaps between colonialism and various political regimes in the 20th century, including fascism, served as an example of the problematic political developments in Germany. An elitist oligarchy has been able to suppress its own population and other peoples for years, which illustrates the U -turn of Germany's once stable political landscape to the precarious conditions of the present.

The way back to a stable economic and political basis is often perceived as a challenge, since the principles of a political national economy are under great pressure in today's world. While countries like China have successfully implemented List's teachings, Germany remains behind these progress by orienting itself to models that do not respond to national needs.

For further information on the development of Germany and the specific economic and political mechanisms, reference is made to detailed reports, as reported . .