Crime under drugs: The unexplained fall of the 16-year-old Libyan

Crime under drugs: The unexplained fall of the 16-year-old Libyan

In the regional court of Korneuburg, a 16-year-old Libyer was on trial, which was confronted with a number of serious allegations. The palette of charges ranges from documents suppression to property damage to severe commercial theft. In view of these allegations, one might think that the young man has some criminal experience, but this is not the case because he was so far without.

As prosecutor Lambert Schöfmann, the youngsters showed little remorse and said several times in the course of the proceedings that he did not remember the incidents what he attributed to drug use. This method of justifying memory through drug use ran through the entire negotiation.

changeable memories and court tactics

One of his most remarkable statements was that he was "reputable" and asked for a "estate". Such statements caused confusion among the judges, since they did not match the usual customs of the court. The 16-year-old seemed to be faced with the events that had taken place in Vienna and Vösendorf, but kept looking for excuses to justify his actions.

One of the most striking incidents occurred on August 16 when the young person stole in the Parfüm department store. Instead of assuming complete responsibility, he assigned the fault of his state to the influence of drugs. His behaviors ensured that he took the fucking with the presiding judge Rainer Gleber size when he tried to present his actions as less criminal.

This critical moment led to an interesting dynamic in the courtroom when the boy admitted the theft from a garden shed in Leobendorf and immediately followed his innocence in relation to jewelry theft. The judge found that the jewelry had been found in his accommodation, which significantly weakened his argument.

judgment and outlook on the future

In his last statement before the court, the defendant regretted his behavior towards the officials and expressed gratitude to have been arrested, since he could now get rid of his drugs. Process assistant Johanna Fuchs supported the youngsters' statement and asked for a mild judgment, but this encountered mixed reactions in the judges. Ultimately, the young man was sentenced to six months of unconditional imprisonment and twelve further months.

The Schöffenenat considered this to be a "sensitive punishment for a first offender", who nevertheless intended to give the young person a second chance. A probation helper will assist during the three years of trial period, in the hope that the young man can steer his life on the right track. Despite the hard judgment, doubts remained whether he would accept the necessary support so as not to be involved in criminal activities again.

For more information about this case, it is worth taking a look at the reporting of www.noen.at , which offers in -depth insights and portrays the course of the procedure.