AMOSLauf in Graz: Psychological instability remained hidden from the army!

AMOSLauf in Graz: Psychological instability remained hidden from the army!

Graz, Österreich - A killing spree in Graz shaked the Republic of Austria on June 12, 2025. The perpetrator, who failed in his position, had psychological instability and did not pass the necessary psychological aptitude test. However, this information was not passed on for data protection reasons, which led to a strong reaction in public. The governor of Styria, Mario Kunasek, expressed his outrage about the existing data protection regulations and called for changes to enable a better information exchange, especially in cases that represent direct dangers to the public.

The Armed Forces, who recognized the psychological instability of the gunner, was not able to pass on such sensitive information. This raises questions about the current legal regulations that may endanger protective measures for the general public.

gun ownership in Austria

In Austria, a number of requirements must be met for the acquisition and possession of revolvers, pistols or semi -automatic firearms. According to the provisions, the applicant must be a reliable citizen of the European Economic Area, at least 21 years old and able to credibly justify why a weapon is needed. Rainer Kastner, a weapon psychologist, emphasizes that many people indicate the interest in sports shooting, but often lead to self -protection.

In addition to receiving a weapon ownership card, proof of dealing with weapons and a psychological report on weapons are also necessary. However, it is worrying that according to Julia Wachter, head of the Böp department's department, outdated tests will continue to be used. These shortcomings lead to an inadequate definition of what experts should actually test.

Criticism of current test standards

The weapon psychological reliability is a central point. Exclusion criteria, such as drug or alcohol addiction, mental disorders and weakness in mental, are given; Nevertheless, a single analysis between the expert and the applicant is not required by law. This is problematic because many serious experts perform one -on -one discussions, while mass tests in which several people are tested are criticized. This practice is considered inadequate and has already led to dangerous situations. The BöP has forwarded documented cases of such mass tests to the ministry, but without making any significant changes.

The Legal Psychology department has also sent a statement to the Ministry in order to point out the need for a serious assessment. Changes in the law often have to be considered after tragic events, which underlines the urgency of the reform.

Overall, the incident in Graz shows how important it is to revise the legal regulations to ensure the protection of the population. A more precise and responsible examination of the weapon ownership applications could prevent tragic incidents in the future.

Further information on weapons law test procedures can be found on kfv.at .