PVA rejects hand prosthesis: Ombudsman Achitz criticizes the authorities!

PVA rejects hand prosthesis: Ombudsman Achitz criticizes the authorities!

In an exemplary case of the challenges in the area of ​​social participation, the Pension Insurance Agency (PVA) rejected Michael G.'s application for a myoelectric forearm prosthesis. Michael G., who has not had a right hand since the age of 15 and is dependent on a non-functional prosthesis, needed the new prosthesis in order to fulfill his professional tasks more efficiently. He works in a trading company and needs the prosthesis to operate computer keys and make product presentations, which significantly affects his ability to work.

As ots.at reports, the PVA had Michael G. test the prosthesis in a rehabilitation center for two weeks, which was successful. Nevertheless, his application was rejected in December, which had a strong psychological impact on him. The Ombudsman, represented by Bernhard Achitz, criticizes the inefficient processing of the application. This was first forwarded to the Austrian Health Insurance Fund (ÖGK), where it remained for a long time before being returned to the PVA.

Criticism of the administration

Bernhard Achitz demands that social insurance cover the costs of the prosthesis in order to enable Michael G. to work for a longer period of time. The rejection is cited as a prime example of inadequate administrative processes and lack of support for people with disabilities. This is in stark contrast to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD), which calls for the full participation of people with disabilities in social life.

Inclusion and participation are central topics that go far beyond the individual case. As bpb.de explains, there is no binding definition of inclusion, but it is generally understood as the equal participation of all people, especially people with disabilities, in social life. Associated with this are requirements for the various institutions to open up and adapt to people's individual needs.

Social perspectives and challenges

The challenges are evident not only in Michael G.'s case, but also in the broader societal perspective. Social barriers still exist that discriminate against people with disabilities in everyday life. Statistics show that the unemployment rate for people with severe disabilities is above average and that many often feel lonely and have little trust in political institutions.

In order to strengthen the participation of people with disabilities, measures are necessary that not only take their individual lifestyles into account, but also break down social barriers. This is in line with the objectives of Book IX of the Social Code and the Federal Participation Act, which promote an improvement in the participation opportunities of people with disabilities. The discussion about inclusion has the potential to fundamentally change the structures of our society for the better and enrich the lives of everyone involved.