The path to knowledge: How the Anthropocene redefines our story

The path to knowledge: How the Anthropocene redefines our story

The upcoming exhibition "Sooviet Anthropocene 1933" shows how topics such as genocide and eco -sides interlock. This formative art exhibition, which deals with the inheritance of collective trauma and the effects of colonialism, is led by the artist Lia Dostlieva, which was born in Donetsk, Ukraine. The opening will take place in the knowledge works city as part of the Art/Science Festival "Irritation" on January 30, 2025. Based on the publication "Trilobites of Donetsk Basin", which appeared in 1933, the exhibition addresses the terrible effects of the famines caused by the Soviets in Ukraine, which demanded millions of lives. Dostlieva is 2024 CEC Artslink International Fellow and has already shown her works in important European institutions, including the Ukrainian pavilion at the 60th Biennale in Venice.

anthropocene debate and their historical classification

The term "anthropocene" is considered in the current discussion as a complex argument between human existence and natural processes. A new analysis of the anthropocene debate illuminates how the separation between human and non-human history has been designed as an answer to the discovery of geological depth since the reconnaissance times of historians and philosophers. This discovery, which questions people as a central historical actor and at the same time considers the earth to be changeable and valuable, illustrates the historical and philosophical challenges that combine with the understanding of history and time. The impressions of European enlightenment, mainly viewing history from an anthropocentric perspective, reflect in the current discourses and demand repositioning of man in the perception of his role within a larger ecological framework, such as Steglich.de clearly shown.

While the exhibition of Lia Dostlieva has a conscious awareness of the tragic effects of human action, the Anthropocene debate requires a contemporary re-evaluation of the historical time and the role of man within these stories. In view of the global ecological challenges, it becomes clear that the relocation of history into the depths of time not only requires a scientific but also a cultural redesign that redefines the nature of humanity and its relationship with earth. It is therefore of essential importance to contrast these discourses to develop a better understanding of the mutual effects of human and non-human influences on our planet, as bielefeld. now describes.