Shock judgment: Flat-rate asylum for Afghan-family reunification threatens!

Shock judgment: Flat-rate asylum for Afghan-family reunification threatens!

In a directional decision, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) decided in favor of Afghan women. These can now apply for asylum in Europe due to their gender. This is a significant assessment of the situation in Afghanistan, where women are systematically suppressed. The judges named practices such as forced seeing, coincidence and restrictions in the field of education as forms of persecution that are in accordance with slavery. As a result, Afghan women no longer have to prove that they are particularly affected by persecution if they return to their homeland. This decision has far-reaching implications, explained .

criticism and possible effects

The decision of the ECJ met with the FPÖ, particularly at the FPÖ. The EU parliamentary deputy Petra Steger sharply criticized the verdict and described it as a "alien". In her opinion, the CJEU undermines the restrictive asylum policy of Europe through these decisions. Instead, Steger calls for a national asylum policy that is not based on the EU requirements. The SPÖ politician Elisabeth Rossmann reacted differently, who welcomed the judgment as a progressive step.

One of the much discussed consequences of the judgment is the possibility of family reunification. This means that not only Afghan women can look for protection in Europe, but can also do their families. Theoretically, this could lead to husbands who may not flee from the country. Islamist men in particular could use this family reunification, such as in the report of derStatus.at further explained.

comparable asylum rights for other countries

The ECJ has already made similar decisions in other cases. One example is the judgment in June that grants Palestinian refugees an asylum law in Europe, unless they can be protected by the United Nations aid organization for Palestine refugees in the Middle East (UNRWA). These decisions could have far -reaching consequences for the asylum policy of the EU, especially with regard to the indispensable of those affected.

The debate about the judgment shows how complex and complex asylum policy can be in Europe. While some see the judgment as necessary protection for women in need of protection, others fear the creation of "blank asylum rights" that open potential loopholes for abuse. The discussion about the course of the course of European asylum policy remains explosive and polarizing.