New Orleans Saints gain legal dispute over Fleur-de-Lis-Logo
New Orleans Saints gain legal dispute over Fleur-de-Lis-Logo
A court of the United States has a lawsuit against the Rel = "NOFOLLOW" TARGET = "_ blank" https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/sport/kellen-moore-new-orleans-shad-coach-spt/index.html "> New Orleans Saints , a man, a" direct after driving of France ”. He had raised claims for the trademark of the Fleur-de-Lis symbol.
background of the lawsuit
In a Court Document explained michel j. Messier, he and his family owned the "intellectual property rights on the brands Fleur de Lys, Orleans and Saints" and wanted the patent of the nfl -Franchise for these symbols.
judicial decision and further steps
However, the court ruled that Messier's claim has not presented any evidence and that neither he nor his family currently used the Fleur-de-Lis in any business capacity to justify a consideration. Messier announced that it would be submitted to a further amendment to the Supreme Court of the United States by May 1, "including but not limited to the commercial value of the approximately 1,500-year business activities of my family."
Furthermore, claims in relation to " name, picture and Similarity ”to submit for the Fleur-de-Lis and legal steps against the characterization of the court to describe him as a" mere single-mixer "in the" own family business ".
The Trademark story of the Saints
The Saints received a brand registration from the US patent and trademark office in 1974 for the use of a stylized fleur-de-Lis symbol after they were in 1967 a professional nfl team. Since then, the symbol - a three -leaf flower that has become the emblem of the city of New Orleans - has been closely connected to the Louisiana team and is displayed on the helmets of the players.
a historical connection
The fleur-de-lis has long been associated with the French monarchy, with the origins back . Messier's original application at the Trial and Appeal Board was rejected in June 2024, a decision that he later contested at the Federal Court of Appeal.
Messier claims that the Fleur-de-Lis symbol was used by his family "over several centuries", according to the court documents. However, the Federal Court agreed to the decision of the Trial and Appeal Board that Messier's claim did not offer enough basis to claim the symbol.
conclusion
The judgment found that the case was rejected because Messier did not have the necessary authorization: “Since Mr. Messier is not exhausted, we lack the responsibility to check the characteristics of his appeal procedure.”
Kommentare (0)