Scandal in the Ministry of Defense: Green light for secret jet purchases?
Criticism of the Defense Minister over the planned jet procurement: transparency and tendering required, contradictions uncovered.

Scandal in the Ministry of Defense: Green light for secret jet purchases?
The current situation surrounding the planned procurement of Leonardo training jets by the Ministry of Defense is increasingly causing political turmoil. Despite the criticism, Minister Klaudia Tanner (ÖVP) continued to stick to the plans. The Green Party is calling for additional transparency, in particular the disclosure of the Procurement Review Commission's report. David Stögmüller, the Green Party's spokesman for national defense, criticized the fact that the current national defense report does not provide any answers to relevant questions about the lack of a tender and the expanded operational tasks. This lack of clarity is seen as worrying by the Greens, as the 2024 report suddenly raises new points about airspace defense that were not mentioned in the previous report. However, the Greens' motion to submit the infamous report was postponed in committee, while it has been before the ministry for weeks and already contains critical comments and suggestions for improvements to communication policy.
Accusations of corruption have become particularly loud in recent weeks. The planned procurement is to be carried out as part of a government-to-government deal with Italy to replace Saab 105 jets. Stögmüller emphasizes that the Army's service description is explicitly tailored to the M-346 FA from Leonardo, which raises the suspicion of a monopoly-like relationship. The ability to refuel in the air is also not considered necessary, although experts consider this function to be essential for training missions. With a financial framework of around one billion euros for twelve aircraft, the criticism is not unfounded.
Political reactions and demands
Stögmüller has sent parliamentary questions to the Defense Minister and the Ministry of Justice. The need for a comprehensive review of such high expenditure becomes obvious. In addition, the question of international competitors from the USA and South Korea not being taken into account due to restrictions in the aviation industry remains unanswered. The minister sees critical questions as damaging to the republic, which the Greens interpret as a sign of a lack of transparency.
Transparency International's transparency report, which examines the arms industry's influence on security and defense policy, provides additional context. In Germany, a significant influence of defense companies on politics has been identified, which contradicts the requirements for control by parliament and government. In Austria, similar patterns appear to be evident in which legal regulations are not sufficiently enforced. The report calls for urgent legal changes and increased control over lobbying activities to address systemic weaknesses.
Outlook for the future
The training jet project will continue to be closely monitored. Experts warn of the need to adequately regulate both political and economic influences in order to create transparency. The ongoing discourse and parliamentary initiatives could be decisive for how defense procurement policy is shaped in the future.
The problem surrounding the jet purchase and the associated allegations are a clear sign that there is an urgent need for action to strengthen trust in the armed forces' defense policy decisions and the accountability of politicians. The outcome of this discussion remains to be seen, but the need for more transparency and control is unmistakable.