Wahlchaos in Schleswig-Holstein: suspected manipulation at European elections!

Wahlchaos in Schleswig-Holstein: suspected manipulation at European elections!

Schrevenborn, Deutschland - A storm of indignation unfolds in Schleswig-Holstein! The Heikendorf citizen and AfD politician Prof. Dr. Karin Kaiser raises severe allegations against the state election manager Tobias M. Berger. She asks: "What does the state election manager of Schleswig-Holstein have to hide?" Kaiser, who acts as an auditor and tax consultant, is concerned about possible cover -ups in the European elections 2024 and criticizes the disregard of the four -eye principle in the right of voting.

"My objection to the European elections of June 9, 2024 is currently being examined in the election examination procedure of the German Bundestag," explains Kaiser. In her statement of September 11, 2024, the state election manager simply negated the four -eye principle, which is set in the European elections. "This is a scandal!" Said Kaiser, who found serious defects in her election observation in the Schrevenborn office. She speaks of disabilities and suspicion of choice manipulation, especially in the postal voting that the AfD could harm.

allegations and defects

The allegations are alarming: Kaiser reports that she was repeatedly denied access to the election table. "The director Juliane Bohrer has refused me for the fourth time in a row to count the public's principle of the vote," outraged the AfD politician. In her analysis of the choice, she found a considerable mismatch between urn and postal votes that raises suspicion of choice manipulation.

The state election manager, on the other hand, countered that the public was guaranteed at all times. "A locally limited admission restriction does not violate the principle of the public," said Berger. But Kaiser remains skeptical: "A bad light throws on the suitability of the state election manager that he does not know or cannot apply the clear regulations in European election law." It calls for a comprehensive information and sees the ongoing election examination procedure as the last hope for transparency.