Serious allegations against Vonovia: Professor criticizes residential policy in Dresden

Serious allegations against Vonovia: Professor criticizes residential policy in Dresden

Dresden. In an unusual press conference in the town hall, which should actually serve the announcement of a cooperation between the city of Dresden and the police Marcel Schöne from the Saxon police college presented his study on housing policy in Dresden. This presentation exposed significant problems, especially with regard to the practices of the housing company Vonovia, which received serious allegations. Schönen explained that the company's policy in districts such as Gorbitz and Prohlis contributed to crime and social conflicts. His central claim was: "Vonovia creates her problems."

The press conference was not without explosiveness. Representatives of the Vonovia were not present and only learned from the results of the study through media reports. Matthias Wulff, a spokesman for the company, described this development as "unpleasant".

vonovia: engagement and criticism

Professor Schöne describes that he and his team received important data for their investigation in February as part of a visit organized by Vonovia in the quarters. "We welcome that research is being carried out in difficult districts," said Wulff. But when the researchers wished deeper insights, communication was stopped. Vonovia no longer reacted to repeated inquiries to provide information.

The research results illustrate that Vonovia plays a decisive role in the development of social focal points in the city. Beautiful reported on a pronounced segregation of the tenant groups in the various residential areas. While old and low -income people live together in a confined space, this often leads to tensions and an increased risk of harmful behaviors.

social differences and crime rates

The study shows that crime, including crimes against sexual self -determination, is strikingly high in areas such as Prohlis and Gorbitz. Beautiful emphasizes that through the type of housing concept and the rental practice of Vonovia, these problems come to daylight. However, similar problems remain hidden in chic districts, which leads to a falsified perception of crime between different social classes.

In the past, the new apartments in Gorbitz and Prohlis were considered modern, but now they are socially stigmatized. Beautiful speaks of "ghettoization tendencies" and, with his investigations, proves that the living space is not distributed random, but that certain groups are specifically accommodated in certain residential complexes. This not only leads to an increased perception of crime, but also to an increased risk for the residents themselves.

The living situation in Dresden reflects a complex interplay of social and economic factors. In particular, the claim that Vonovia no longer wants to invest money in the renovation of certain houses adds another dimension to the debate. In fact, this strategy could aim to sell the properties to the city profitably later.

The city administration has not yet commented on the results of the study. Mayor Jan Donhauser promised to examine the study more precisely and to perform with all relevant actors.

The problems presented by Marcel Schöne and the unanswered questions make a highlight of the challenges that the city of Dresden has to cope with in terms of housing policy and social integration. Vonovia tries to invalidate the allegations raised by emphasizing that the company worked together with the city to distribute occupancy rights more evenly. But beautiful remains skeptical and notes: "Very few people live there because they want to live there."