Dispute over rescue control centers: Trust of the employees crumbles!

Dispute over rescue control centers: Trust of the employees crumbles!

Wolfratshausen, Deutschland - A storm of indignation is brewed! The employees of the integrated control center (ILS) are anything but happy about the planned merger with the ILS Fürstenfeldbruck. The dissatisfaction among the dispatchers is growing, and the allegations against the decision -makers are increasing. An open letter from the Weilheim employees hit the waves and the reaction of the responsible special purpose association (ZRF) only fueled the situation. False information and a "conscious distortion of the facts" are in the room!

The district councilors of the Weilheim-Schongau districts, Bad Tölz-Wolfratshausen and Garmisch-Partenkirchen defend their decision on merger in a detailed letter. They emphasize that the merging of control centers is also on the agenda of the Bavarian Ministry of the Interior and is recommended by a nationwide commission. But the ILS employees vehemently countered: "The interpretation of the ZRF neglects important differentiations!" They argue that the Commission demands flexible, regionally adapted solutions and not the rigid requirement of centralization.

trust in danger!

The ILS employees are alerted! They see the confidence in the decision -makers and accuse the ZRF not to distinguish between a normal control center and an integrated control center. While a control center only accepts medical emergency calls, an integrated control center coordinates all emergency services - fire brigade, mountain rescue and water watch. "The representation of the ZRF does not correspond to the facts!" Said the angry critics.

The protest against the merger grows! A former ambulance service employee has launched a petition that has already found thousands of supporters. Citizens and employees are loud to save the control center and rethink the decision of the district administrators. The conflict between the rescuers is becoming more and more heated, and the question remains: Who really has the truth on his side?