Supreme Court checks historical tictok ban-important aspects

Supreme Court checks historical tictok ban-important aspects

On Friday, the UK Supreme Court will advise whether Tikkok's connections to China are a danger to national security. This is done in the context of a more than two -hour procedure, which deals with the question of whether a ban on the platform approved in April with Bipartisan support can be reconciled with the first constitutional additive. If a majority of the judges come to the conclusion that a ban is permitted, Tiktok would either have to find a new owner or be closed in the USA on January 19th.

The role of Tikkok and its user base

With an estimated 170 million users in the USA, Tiktok will argue in front of a court that is known for its technological reluctance - many processes are still carried out on paper. In addition, the Court tends to give the White House and the Congress more weight in national security issues. However, the supporters of the app emphasize that the importance of freedom of expression predominates the "speculative" fears of data collection and possible manipulation by a foreign opponent.

The influence of the Supreme Court on Social Media

In recent years, the Supreme Court has often decided hesitantly and was inclined to give advantage of the social media that took advantage of it. Although this led to it for the industry, it left fundamental questions open how the founding fathers would be at global platforms that reach millions of people, especially with regard to misinformation and hate speeches.

a blunt look at technological developments

The Court of Justice has approached the developing technologies with a certain humility in the past. "We really don't know much about these things," judge Elena Kagan noticed during a negotiation in 2023 on the question of whether Twitter and other platforms should be freed from legal liability for her content. "These are not exactly the nine largest experts on the Internet," added Kagan.

The dangers of Tikkok from the government's perspective

One of the central arguments of the bid administration states that Tikkok represents a "serious" threat to national security. This is based, among other things, that the platform collects "huge amounts of data" over millions of Americans and China may have the opportunity to secretly manipulate the platform in order to spread discord and misinformation.

important points in today's procedure

If a majority of the judges share the argumentation of the former Chief Counsel of the Senate for Foreign Relations, Jamil Jaffer, this could be a bad sign for Tiktok. Jaffer said: "The ability to influence what 175 million Americans see on Tikok means that the Chinese government controls the news offer for the majority of Americans under the age of 30, use Tikok as its primary news source."