Security affair: USA discusses military plans in chat - outrage great!

Security affair: USA discusses military plans in chat - outrage great!

Jemen, Land - The publication of a chat course that reveals secret attack plans against the Huthi militia in Yemen causes massive discussions and outrage in the USA. The US magazine The Atlantic has published screenshots from a signal chat, in which high-ranking government officials, including Vice President JD Vance and Defense Minister Pete Hegseth, discussed details on upcoming military promotions. The discussions took place just a few hours before the attacks actually carried out on March 15th.

The government under President Donald Trump vehemently rejected the exchange of secret information. Trump himself told the press not to have any information about the group chat and described the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic , Jeffrey Goldberg. The incident has triggered a wave of criticism, especially on the part of the Democrats, which require comprehensive information.

security gaps and responsibilities

National Security Advisor Mike Waltz took full responsibility for the security gap, which made it possible Goldberg to enter the group chat. The signal app developed for logistical matters is not permitted for the exchange of sensitive information between government officials. The use of this platform has triggered a lot of outrage, since military information has to be treated strictly in order not to endanger national security.

In addition, a spokesman for the National Security Council commented and confirmed the authenticity of the published information. An internal examination has been announced. However, Hegseth rejected the severity of the incident and described Goldberg as "discredited and highly discredited" while he explained that no secret war plans were discussed in chat.

political reactions and outlook

The political reaction was clearly split: while the Democrats massively criticized and urged an urgent education, many Republicans replaced the incident. The debate about the security situation was heated up by the statements of prominent Democrats, including Senator Jack Reed, who described them as "dangerous" and a great failure. Senator Chuck Schumer spoke of "amateurous behavior" and asked for a comprehensive work -up.

Goldberg, who initially questioned the authenticity of the original entertainment, made it clear in his article that the discussions about attack plans were indeed. The incidents also take a high level of challenges in dealing with security -relevant information at a time when the threat of military conflicts is in the foreground. It remains to be seen which consequences and reforms will result from this incident.