Olaf Scholz in front of the abyss: the end of a rumbling chancellor!

Olaf Scholz in front of the abyss: the end of a rumbling chancellor!

A drama in German politics! Chancellor Olaf Scholz is in front of the shards of his term in his term, while he throws Christian Lindner, finance minister and FDP chairman. At the center of the storm: A bitter-evil acceptance speech in the SPD parliamentary group, which many only call an anger speech. The Chancellor suspicion Lindner of having tacted as petty and abused his trust. But what is really behind Scholz's facade of the statesman? His opponents accuse him of not being irritated, but to be resentful and sneaky.

Now Scholz wants to continue with a fragile red-green minority government. The Union involuntarily has to serve as a hostage. Robert Habeck takes over the Ministry of Finance, while Scholz plans to realize left -wing redistribution ideas before Christmas - everything without deciding on a solid household. But a Damocles sword hovers over this grandiose plan: the debt brake! Scholz calls for avoiding this, even though it is anchored in the Basic Law. But even the Federal Constitutional Court does not scare Scholz. He ignores the sensitive consequences and cleverly hides the legal limits.

tensions and political scandal

Olaf Scholz 'idea of ​​a rule without a "either or" "strategy is the central point of dispute. Lindner's refusal to expand the financial scope in order to finance social policies from their own means calls Scholz "poison". It is obvious: in housekeeping you cannot draw from the full without end. But Scholz remained stubborn and flirting with constitutional gray areas. Lindner, on the other hand, insists on compliance with the debt brake and sees Scholz 'demands as a breach of the constitution. A public back and forth that makes the political waves high.

The Chancellor who was supposed to appear as a statesman leaves the stage more as an ideologist than as an intermediary. Now that Germany faces so many challenges, his chancellery ends in a way that describes its critics as faceless and cowardly. Now the story will decide whether Scholz will be remembered as a chancellor who failed to show leadership in difficult times or whether his political ideas were only ahead of time. But one thing is clear: the legacy he leaves could shape the political landscape for a long time.