Viennese citizens happy: summer vacation and political preferences clear!

Viennese citizens happy: summer vacation and political preferences clear!

The current mood in Vienna shows that the satisfaction of the citizens with the leisure and recreational offers in the Grätzen is still high. According to the W24 city barometer, carried out by W24 and IFDD, 76 % of those surveyed stated that they were satisfied with the options offered. The survey period extended from June 23 to 25, 2025 and included 1000 respondents.

50 % of the respondents plan a trip for the upcoming summer, while 35 % stay at home and want to attend 12 % friends or family. As preferred travel destinations, 71 % of travelers show a preference for abroad, while 27 % remain domestic. It is also interesting that 85 % of the participants consider cooling measures such as greening and water features as important, which underlines the need for climate protection measures.

election behavior and political preferences

The political landscape of Vienna remains stable, as the latest surveys for the upcoming mayoral election show. 51 % of the respondents would choose Michael Ludwig from the SPÖ, while Dominik Nepp favors 23 % of the votes from the FPÖ. Judith Pühringer from the Greens and Bettina Emmerling from the Neos come to 14 % and 4 %. It is expected that the SPÖ will remain dominant with 40 % of the votes in the state and municipal council elections, followed by the FPÖ with 21 % and the Greens with 15 %.

A voter current analysis is intended to provide further insights into voter hikes between the parties and provides information about the voting behavior and the election motifs of the electorate. It is examined how many voters of their party have remained true to which new voters could be obtained and how many voices were lost. Such analyzes are particularly important for newly starting parties to understand the composition of their electorate.

theoretical approaches to the election behavior

The election behavior of the citizens is influenced by various theoretical models. The scientific discussion has produced four main areas: the microsociological, macrosociological, individual psychological and rational approach. The microsociological approach emphasizes the importance of the social environment, while the macrosociological approach analyzes the development of party systems. The individual psychological approach focuses on emotional bonds on parties, and the rational approach looks at individual decision -making limestone.

This variety of explanatory approaches illustrates the complexity of the election behavior, which cannot be mapped in a single model. Election research has made considerable progress in recent decades, but a comprehensive theory of election behavior is still an unmatched goal.