Vienna remains Vienna: FPÖ is fighting new posters for security and fairness!

Vienna remains Vienna: FPÖ is fighting new posters for security and fairness!

Wien, Österreich - The FPÖ starts a striking new poster campaign that specifically deals with the topics of asylum, security and social justice. Under the motto "Safe Pensions instead of asylum million" and "hard -working reward instead of asylum millions", the party around chairman Dominik Nepp wants to clarify that the money should be used better for asylum persons for the support of Austrian nurses, teachers and police officers. This strategy can already be seen in the first posters that the FPÖ recently presented, as the Krone reported.

The posters also address the need for reforms in social responsibility. With demands such as a unique pensioner bonus of 2000 euros and more salary for nursing staff, it is clarified that the freedoms want to focus on those "deserved" according to Nepp. In addition, in its slogans, the FPÖ emphasizes the urgency to act against "asylum fraudsters", which puts it as a central election issue. At the same time, the ÖVP is promoting political and social stability below Karl Mahrer with the message "Vienna remains Vienna".

unusual slogans and political rivalries

The FPÖ not only can be guided by serious topics in its poster campaign, but also relies on creative rhymes in order to emphasize their concerns. "Asylum fraudsters have to go-red-black does not want to understand" is one of the new rhymes that are shown. As the press reported, the FPÖ not only wants to address voters with the election campaign, but also to meet media requests for memorable, rhymed messages.

This is done in the context of a increased competition among the political parties, since both the FPÖ and the ÖVP try to convince voters with powerful slogans. The ÖVP counteracts the FPÖ with its own advertisement, in which it deals with similar topics, but against a more positive background. The tension between the parties clearly shows in the content and the representation of their campaigns, with each party trying to legitimize their view of the national challenges and at the same time criticize the mistakes of others.