Weidel's double standard: Public vs. Private flood of advertisements!

Weidel's double standard: Public vs. Private flood of advertisements!

Vienna, Österreich - Alice Weidel, the co-chair of the AfD, again ensures controversy. It publicly criticizes the paragraph 188 of the Criminal Code, which offers politicians legal protection against insults. In an interview, Weidel accused the political class of taking a "mimosic" appearance and using the judiciary to suppress critical voices. This happened as early as December 2024, when she expressed her displeasure with dealing with expressions of opinion. At the same time, the AfD brings a draft law to abolish this paragraph into the Bundestag, which gives its criticism additional explosiveness. show that Weidel and some of their party colleagues often use this paragraph privately.

The lawyers of Weidel report a significant number of advertisements that are predominantly against them personally - in about 90 percent of cases. Weidel's speaker has confirmed a double -digit number of ads and Justified has the use of the paragraph with the argument of "legal gun equality". But this double tongue that is against a law that is also used for your own defense is sharply criticized. As a result, Weidel's trustworthiness is questioned again.

double morality and private reality

Another topic that puts the credibility of Weidel to the test is her personal life situation. She has lived in a registered civil partnership for 16 years and has two children. This is in strong contradiction to the conservative positions of the AfD, which traditionally propagates the "traditional family". The discrepancy between Weidel's public appearance and its private reality is considered problematic and raises questions about the integrity of their political views. Spiegel.de Discussion about their appropriateness in the political debate further.

The discussion about paragraph 188 is of growing interest for many. He protects people of political life from insults, bad recovery and defamation, among other things. The punishments for such offenses can be imprisoned or fines for up to three years, whereby certain conditions must apply to the application of the paragraph. This stipulates that the crime must be committed publicly or in a meeting and that the motives are related to the position of the insulted in public life. Journalist: Inside and other public persons also enjoy protection if they deal with important state affairs. remain controversial these paragraphs and its application in the political landscape.

The increase in advertisements against politicians, especially on the part of the AfD, is critically considered in the political discussion. While the AfD wants to abolish the paragraph, the question remains whether it will continue to benefit from the advantages that it offers. The topic remains relevant and the opinions are split.