Climate fighter Anja Windl: Disease and expulsion threaten!

Climate fighter Anja Windl: Disease and expulsion threaten!

The German climate activist Anja Windl is faced with an extensive legal catalog that not only poses legal challenges in Germany, but also endangers her residence permit in Austria. As the news portal Krone , the Stuttgart district court recently issued a criminal order against Windl. This refers to her campaign in August at Stuttgart Airport, where she cut a hole in a fence and then sticked to a roller train.

Windl is not only faced with a possible arrest warrant, but also with a fine of 5,400 euros that is in the room. Already in early February she was released from custody in Klagenfurt, where she had to serve a six -week replacement imprisonment because she could not pay fines in the past few months. The activist plans to object to the penalty order, which could lead to another process in Stuttgart.

Legal challenges in Austria

In Austria, Windl not only threatens the expulsion, but also legal consequences due to a dog droppings lubricating attack on the facade of the ÖVP party center. Although there was already an expulsion in the room two years ago, it was not carried out at the time. However, the situation of the activist remains tense, especially since she has been in custody in the past.

climate activism, as Windl runs him, has increasingly gained explosiveness in recent years. Actions of groups such as the "last generation" divide public opinion in Germany. Activists often stick to driven roads to block traffic, which leads to different legal interpretations. According to anwalt.de such a protest form according to § 240 StGB, depending on whether the actions have been announced or whether emergency car was affected are.

The legal situation is often unclear and variable in such cases. A judgment of the Berlin-Tiergarten District Court, for example, found that physical violence is given by traffic blocks, while other judgments were classified similarly as not reprehensible, provided that no life rescue was endangered. Activists who refuse to be removed by the police could violate the criminal offense of resistance to enforcement officers (Section 113 (1) of the Criminal Code); However, this is often denied, however, since the actors are usually removed without resistance.