Zoff in the Bavarian Hunting Association: Jäger fight for hunting knives and influence

Zoff in the Bavarian Hunting Association: Jäger fight for hunting knives and influence

The Bavarian Hunting Association (BJV) is located in the middle of an internal power struggle that culminated in the resignation announcement by the Justiceist Diane Schrems-Scherbarth. In her letter, she expresses sharp criticism of President Ernst Weidenbusch and his autocratic leadership style, which in her opinion has severely affected the cooperation in the Presidium. This development is particularly explosive, since the organization is confronted with the challenges of the current weapons law reform, which also affects the handling of hunting knives.

Schrems-Scherbarth, a doctoral lawyer from Regensburg, emphasizes that information is not communicated transparently and that there is no basic work processes. She regrets that even as a judiciary, the procurement of information often only comes about through repeated inquiries. Protocols of the Presidium meetings are no longer distributed, which endangers significant decisions regarding hunting policy issues. Instead, these central decisions are made without the broad say of the Presidium within a smaller management group.

internal differences and leadership style

The closer management group of the BJV, led by Weidenbusch, mainly consists of its deputies, the general secretary and the managing director. Internally, the general perception of Schrems-Scherbarth's resignation is considered understandable, but you are not agreed with criticism. It is argued that in times when quick decisions are required, a simplification of the processes is necessary, even if this is possible at the expense of a broad debate in the Presidium. This is also evident in the open conflict with Wolfgang Morlang, a prominent presidium member who pursues a different strategy to avoid a possible ban on hunting meters.

Morlang suggests that the BJV should join a supportive petition, while Weidenbusch considers its political connections to be more effective. This different approach has led to tensions between the two. Morlang's perspective is that members have to be included in decision -making processes, which in contrast to Weidenbusch's approach is in the organization.

Weidenbusch communicated his attitude to the controversial topics, which met with displeasure with Morlang and other members. The BJV President, who was formerly a member of the Bavarian state parliament, was convinced in his statements that he has minimized the threats to the hunters, and does not consider the petition to be expedient.

reactions and allegations

In the discussion, the role of DJV President Helmut Dammann-Tamke, who publicly criticized Weidenbusch and rejected the assumption that the DJV was not in dialogue with politics. This argument reflects the deep cracks in the association and shows how far the opinions about the right strategies differ.

The internal conflicts not only run along these important topics, but also touch personal relationships and trust in the leadership. Weidenbusch gives way to the allegations by pointing out that the Justizar himself is responsible for a mistake that has appeared in an important procedure in the past. This dispute over the leadership and communication structures could shape and influence the image of the BJV, as the organization is perceived externally.

The situation remains tense because Weidenbusch and his Coburg associations try to drive their projects forward despite internal and external criticism. In an environment in which many decisions will require meetings in the future, the relationship of trust could continue to come under pressure.

Important information and a detailed look at the current situation are in a Article on www.sueddeutsche.de to be found.