Green demand transparency: government only saves in the wrong field!

Green demand transparency: government only saves in the wrong field!

In Austria there is massive criticism of the current government structure, especially the size of the government offices. The deputy club chairwoman of the Greens, Alma Zadić, was concerned about the discrepancy between the cuts in climate protection and expenses for the cabinet of the federal ministries. According to a request from the green, 364 people are currently working in these cabinets, which is a record value. In addition, the Federal Chancellery employs 102 employees: inside for press and public relations. These figures were published by OTS political system.

Zadić criticizes that despite the government's official statements, the opposite is the opposite. It demands more transparency in resource division and emphasizes that politics should go ahead with a good example. In her opinion, the current situation weakens the trust of the citizens: inside into politics. Zadić makes it clear that the government should meet its own demands much better.

challenges in climate protection

The Federal Government has defined climate protection as a central task to reduce CO2 emissions and to counteract global global warming. The core of national climate policy is the climate protection law, which provides for greenhouse gas neutrality for Germany until 2045, as reported by Federal Government.de . In 2023, greenhouse gases in Germany fell by more than 10 % compared to the previous year, which has been the highest decline for over 30 years.

The Federal Government has initiated measures in various areas, including traffic, energy and agriculture. A major challenge remains the coal phase -out, which is to be carried out by 2038 at the latest, and the complete transition to renewable energies. By 2030, at least 80 % of German electricity consumption is to be covered from renewable energy sources.

international perspectives and justice

The climate -political discourse shows a paradoxical reality: political actors demand higher climate goals, but there is often a lack of suitable instruments for implementing these goals. The Federal Constitutional Court has criticized the Climate Protection Act in the past, since it does not adequately meet the needs of fundamental rights and does not set the necessary emission reductions. This discussion about targets is reinforced by the need for a more comprehensive debate about the measures to implement, as in a contribution by Wirtschaftsdienst.eu

Sustainable climate policy should meet both justice and efficiency criteria. It is crucial to communicate the social costs of climate policy transparently to ensure broad social acceptance. The international comparison shows that during Germany there is an isolated approach and offer other countries open to technology. This national objective often distracts from the necessary discussions about costs and instruments.

The challenges in climate protection require global coordination and international cooperation in order to be effective. This is the only way to achieve the goal of climate neutrality, and the trust of society in the political measures can be strengthened. It is to be hoped that the government will react to criticism and develop a more transparent, more efficient policy that takes into account both current and future generations.