Court confirms judgment against armaments of ‘rust’

Court confirms judgment against armaments of ‘rust’

A judge confirmed the guilty verdict against Hannah Gutierrez Reed on Monday, the weapon master on the set of the film "Rust". The court decided that evidence that had not been handed over had no influence on the judgment. Her defense had asked for a new process because the indictment had failed to present a forensic report and an interview with the arms supplier Seth Kenney.

Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer found in her explanation that the accused could not prove that the evidence could have caused a different outcome of the procedure. Gutierrez Reed has been sentenced to an 18-month prison sentence for negligent homicide that goes back to the death of the Halyna Hutchins camera. At the negotiation in Santa Fe in February, the public prosecutor argued that she had treated weapons on the set improperly and failed to recognize a sharp ammunition before luding it into the weapon of Alec Baldwin.

background of the case

When preparing for a scene, the weapon had accidentally given shot and killed Hutchins and injured the director Joel Souza. Baldwin himself was also charged with negligent killing, but his procedure was discontinued in July after the defense had proven that the indictment had not handed over an arsenal to balls. Gutierrez Reed's defense hoped that the same argument would take effect in her case. They argued that the prosecutor Kari Morrissey was negligent during the procedure by not presenting an expert report about "inexplicable tool markings" on Baldwin's weapon.

The judge pointed out that the expert came to the conclusion that these tool markings had no influence on the functioning of the weapon, which probably would probably not have influenced the verdict. Sommer agreed to the position of the public prosecutor that Kenney's interview was redundant compared to other statements he had already made. In addition, she decided that the ammunition inventory that had ended Baldwin's procedure was also available to Gutierrez Reed, which means that it was not entitled to a new process.

further steps

Gutierrez Reed has nevertheless announced that the judgment was appealed for various reasons, including the accusation that the instructions to the jury were incorrect. At the same time, Morrissey is trying to revive the case against Baldwin by arguing that the judge was misleaded by defense and incorrectly assumed that the retained balls would be relevant for Baldwin's case.

In this case, developments in this case remain in the public interest and could rekindle the discussion about security on the film set and the responsibility of people in dealing with weapons. For comprehensive information on this topic, the complete report au.variety.com are read.