Review for Hörl: excitement after controversial wolf shot call!
Review for Hörl: excitement after controversial wolf shot call!
In a sensational judgment, the court announced an acquittal in a sensational judgment in the case of Johann Hörl, an Austrian politician. The accusation was "intentional damage to the animal or plant population" and the request for an act threatened with punishment. According to the court spokeswoman Birgit Fink, Hörl's controversial commentary was a "spontaneous area" in a "heated atmosphere". A recording of his speech, in which he called to shoot wolves, caused excitement and was published on YouTube. During a meeting of the farmers' association,Hörl expressed the sentence in August 2022: "If such a Sauviech appears, shoot". The public prosecutor then complained to him, but the court found that Hörl had not acted with intent. An acquittal that led to a sometimes positive echo. Hörl himself was relieved after the negotiation and said: "I am glad that we live in a constitutional state". However, the judgment is not final.
judgment for interrogation managers
In the course of the procedure, the person responsible for the recording of the video was also charged and sentenced to a fine of over 2,000 euros, which is due to half. The court saw him a "planned procedure" due to the processing and publication of the video and therefore decided differently than Hörl. However, this judgment is also not final.
The context of the Animal Welfare Act
The topic of dealing with animals, especially wolves, is not only discussed in a legally but also socially intensive discussion. According to the Animal Welfare Act, which applies to all animals, the addition of avoidable pain or suffering is prohibited. Most provisions of the law refer to vertebrates such as dogs and cats. Animal welfare violations can be punished both according to the Animal Welfare Act and as property damage.
The problem is difficult by the differences in protection intensity for different animal species. Animal -proof reports are often inadequate for many animals, especially in agriculture, and violate the provisions of the Animal Welfare Act. Requirements for an association law in animal welfare are gaining in importance in order to give animal welfare associations the opportunity to file a lawsuit in the name of the animals.
In this case, developments in this case throw a light on the tensions around animal welfare and the handling of wild animals as well as the legal framework that apply. In view of the current discussion about the role of wolves in nature and its protection, we need more clarity and a stronger set of rules in animal protection law.
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Ort | Ort, Österreich |
| Quellen | |