Tikok users want to convince Scotus of dance videos and not of China

Tikok users want to convince Scotus of dance videos and not of China

TIKTOK, the popular social media platform, which is celebrated for their entertaining dance videos, cat pranks, news clips and recipes, stands before the Supreme Court of the US

background of the legal examination

The bidges defends a ban on Tikkok and emphasizes the national security risks that emerge from the app's Chinese parent company. Tikok and his supporters try to draw attention to the Reder rights of millions of Americans who regularly interact with content from the app.

Security and data concerns

The focus of the legal discussion is a serious judgment of a lower court that emphasizes the security concerns of the US government regarding the data collection of American users through Beijing and the possible secret manipulation of TikK content for espionage and other harmful purposes.

positioning of TikTok and the content manufacturer

The members of the subordinate court represent a broad ideological spectrum and enjoy serious respect at the Supreme Court. Tikok and those complaining to the ban have strengthened their argument and warn of the dangers of oppression of freedom of speaking, even if it comes from a foreign opponent. Tikok also changed his legal team for the hearing on Friday and is represented by Noel Francisco, a former US solicitor.

The comprehensive effects on freedom of speech

Lawyer Jeffrey Fisher, who represents individual artists, emphasizes that only a fraction of the content on TikTok could potentially use China's geopolitical interests. "Most content consist of dance videos, instructions on the home repair and assembly of weekend trips," he writes.

decision of the Court of Appeal

The unanimous Court of Appeal in Washington, i.e., was convinced of the arguments of the bidges that the congress had sufficient national security concerns to fear China's control via Tikok by his parent company bytedance. The law forces Tikkok to find a new owner or to be faced with a ban on January 19th.

political support and concerns

The contradictions and prejudices against TikTok have been created in recent years, supported by a broad examination of the dangers that could be carried out by the control of foreign opponents via social media. Under the law, Tiktok would only be allowed to continue after January 19 if it separates from bytedance.

The role of the Supreme Court

In her defense argument, Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar emphasizes that there is no doubt that the People's Republic of China (VR China) tries to undermine the US interests by collecting sensitive data about Americans. According to Prelogar, the control of the VR China on Tiktok represents a significant threat to national security through bytedance.

conclusion and outlook

The further developments related to Tikok and the ban could have far -reaching consequences for many Americans who use the platform to communicate and talk. The decision of the Supreme Court is eagerly awaited and will be decisive for the fate of Tikkok in the USA.