Son's bidding gift causes anger: violent criticism from all camps!

Son's bidding gift causes anger: violent criticism from all camps!

Colorado, USA - "Nobody stands above the law-not even the president." These words from US President Joe Biden, originally a top against his predecessor Donald Trump, now collapse on him. The storm of indignation about his controversial decision to pardon his son Hunter rages through the USA. The Republicans attack him with allegations of hypocrisy and veiling. "Joe Biden lied about the corrupt influence of his family from start to finish," throws MP James Comer into the masses via Twitter.

A shock goes through the rows of the Republicans! Senator Charles E. Grassley is stunned: "I am shocked by the pardon because bids often said that he would not do it and I believed it. My mistake". There is also criticism from the Democrats; Jared Polis, Governor of Colorado, expresses an understanding of the father's love, but is disappointed: "As a father, I understand the natural desire to help his son, but I am still disappointed that he has put his family across the country."

Donald Trump and the judicial scandal

The formerly designed US President Donald Trump, himself not inexperienced in the art of pardon, accuses Biden "Abuse of the Justice"-a reproach that appears more than piquant in the face of Trump's own pardon, including Charles Kushner, his father's father. Trump himself will be entered the office again on January 20 and could be in an amazingly similar situation, perhaps even with a self -configuration.

In the middle of the drama, Biden defends his step bravely, denounces the proceedings against Hunter as "unfair" - a legal error, as he says, staged by political opponents. But the file is tricky: Hunter Biden is guilty of a point of the late tax payment. The “New York Times” pulls a parallel and criticizes that bidges now sound suspiciously according to its predecessor because he complains of selective law enforcement and political pressure - a system that he previously defended loudly. The "Wall Street Journal" fuels the controversy by denouncing the political consequences: Both parties seem to be ready to exploit the judiciary when it serves its benefit.