Tempelhof-Schöneberg: Mayor confused with world girls*day

Tempelhof-Schöneberg: Mayor confused with world girls*day

Tempelhof-Schöneberg, Deutschland - In Berlin, an unusual use of the gender star by the mayor of Tempelhof-Schöneberg, Jörn Oltmann (Greens), ensures excitement. In a statement on the World Girls Day on October 11th, he spoke of "World Girls*Day", which revealed the discussion about the correct application of gender -sensitive language. Such formulations are not only linguistically interesting, but also part of a greater social discourse on identity and inclusion.

Oltmann praised the “world girl*party” associated with the event, which was organized by various organizations, including the specialist maiden*work and the youth welfare office. The aim of this campaign was to strengthen girls and young women and to help them find their own way. This is an important step in promoting gender equality and equal opportunities.

meaning of the gender stars

The gender star is usually placed before the ending of a noun, as in “teachers”, in order to address people from different gender identities. However, the use of the star after "girl" and "women" is considered new. As the press office explained, this was deliberately chosen to illustrate the diversity of the gender identities. This wording should also take into account non-binous identities and create an inclusive language of language.

However, the question remains whether the goal is actually achieved. Critics fear that the use of the gender star leads to confusion in this form and distracts the focus from the actual identity of the groups addressed. Girls and women should be celebrated and addressed on the World Girls Day. Verbal constructs that go beyond these identities could water down the original sense.

Another aspect of the debate is the question of how these formulations are used in the future. Are boys approached as "boys*" and men as "men*"? And how will the mayor describe himself? Such interpretations could further heat the language debate.

In addition to discussion about gender-friendly language, there are further challenges in the Tempelhof-Schöneberg district that should be addressed urgently. While the bureaucracy deals with the correct application of gender -friendly language, fundamental problems such as schooling, cleanliness of the sidewalks and housing shortage are still unsolved. Critics accuse the city government of not setting the priorities properly, while the problems that affect the citizens daily remain unresolved.

The population reacts mixed to these linguistic innovations. A clear majority spoke out against the gender language and expects their political representatives to pay attention to the needs of all citizens and not just that of their own party. This division in society illustrates how delicate the topic of gender equality is and that there is still a lot of space for discussions and clarification.

It remains to be seen how political communication in Tempelhof-Schöneberg will develop under the influence of such decisions. The balance between contemporary language and the solution of practical problems remains a challenge for everyone involved.