Russia uses contradictory messages from the White House to Ukraine
Russia uses contradictory messages from the White House to Ukraine
The sight on the split screen is terrifying. On the one hand, the White House, whose politics presents itself in a changeable and revisionist manner and sometimes urgently needs clarification. On the other hand, the Ukraine is located, where
Since the brutal war in Ukraine is now going towards its third year, the two visions threaten to become incompatible. The contradictory positions of the White House are partially responsible for this. Last week, the US defense minister Peter Hegseth said that join and their borders cannot regain before 2014. With this he accidentally revealed a central component of the secret peace plan of US President Donald Trump and Russia's President Vladimir Putin or revealed an important aspect of Ukraine's diplomatic negotiation position. The allies of Ukraine were probably all informed that NATO membership is rather unlikely and that the recovery of the borders before 2014 will not take place in the near future. However, this assessment was held back as a concession to Russia during the negotiations. The drama does not end. The US Vice President JD Vance told the Wall Street Journal that the USA may be sent to Ukraine if the Situation requires-you would use both military and economical "lever". Has he really revealed the exact opposite of Hegseth's comments in Brussels that no American soldiers were sent to Ukraine? Why didn't he mention Russia when he addressed European allies in Munich and spoke about largely fictional totalitarianism in western democracies? Or has Trump promised when he said that in Munich "high-ranking people" from Russia, Ukraine and the USA would take part in an important security conference-or did he mean Saudi Arabia? Moscow and Kyiv do not seem to believe that someone will travel to Munich from this caliber. Or are there secret conversations that Trump cannot be silent about? In this short time back and forth, according to the worst estimates on the battlefield, up to 5,000 soldiers were killed or wounded on the front in Ukraine. Romania and Moldova have complained about Russian drones that disturb their airspace. At least 13 civilians were killed in Russian attacks on Ukraine and 72 injured. A Russian drone was
A war takes place - and Russia wins it, and at a high price for Ukraine - while the White House apparently tries to find out what it really thinks. Behind these fluctuating positions on NATO membership, the borders of Ukraine and the US troops in Ukraine is the dark truth that we simply do not know what Trump and Putin talked about, which has described Trump as more than one call since he came to the White House. First of all, it is important to remember the precedent here: Trump has swept away from the West three years of the isolation of the Kremlin without concessions. He left Marc fogel open -apparently in exchange for Alexander Vinnik to have a multinational billion dollar-cryptocurrency exchange, and and gives the Kremlin a moment of astonishing rehabilitation for an American audience. But so far there have been no public concessions from Russia to Ukraine. Ukraine wanted to build better relationships with the European Union and maybe one day dreamed of joining NATO, but just like Selenskyj, probably dreamed of joining the Beatles one day. None of them will happen in the near future. The revisionist idea that Russia acted to stop NATO membership of Ukraine is a Kremlin argument. And it is now clear that Trump talks more time to Putin than with Selenskyj. He even indicated that Selenskyj's time could soon end in office, since he finally had to prevent elections and his survey values "are not particularly good to express it mildly."
It is difficult to underestimate the influence of the words of the most powerful man in the world, who indicates that a commander does not have a current mandate in the war and may soon have to resign. Perhaps this is part of a private plan - it is certainly what Putin wants, since elections would undoubtedly cause chaos and produce a mandate whose legitimacy is questioned. Above all, it is potentially catastrophic for Ukraine morality - soldiers must agree to continue to risk their lives for a president, whose important financial support see him as a lame duck. Here the two screens collide. The world of Trump is one in which spontaneous statements can be weakened subsequently, and its television -tested cabinet the paradigms of global security are reversed every hour without major consequences. Your echo area only feeds the corrected version of politics. On the other side of the screen, Ukrainians die, lose territories, see apartment blocks reduced too rubble, consider the possibility of desertion and observe how the backbone of their western support breaks down. This is a symphony of chaos for the Kremlin. You know what your goals are, which simply means that you get what you can do. And that is a lot if the key opponent that you actually fear, the United States, is so publicly insecure what she wants, why she wants it and where the red lines lie. peace talks have started, but the sandsind not only for Ukraine in the change that they could develop into Treisand. The conflict in Ukraine approaches a critical point
The uncertainty of US policy
The dark reality of the war
uncertainty about Trump and Putin
false narrative and their consequences
Instead, Trump presented the bizarre revisionism thesis that Russia had invaded Ukraine because it was about to join NATO. In order to emphasize it again in three exhaustive years, Russia invaded Ukraine 2022 without provocation, out of a strategic feeling of having to radiate strength along its borders, and erroneously believing that the invasion would only take a few weeks and are greeted with open arms. The dangers for the Ukrainian morale
The collision of the screens