Faeser: Praise for themselves, responsibility for the countries - asylum policy in the crossfire!

Faeser: Praise for themselves, responsibility for the countries - asylum policy in the crossfire!

A scandal that polarizes: Since the hot August Month, nothing has moved when it comes to deportations to Afghanistan! Minister of the Interior Nancy Faeser shines through two -facilities, while she catches up with new recognition and forwards the dispute to the countries. The last deportation freight to Afghanistan was months ago, and other flights? None! The confusion is perfect, because the Federal Ministry of the Interior has the inquiries fizzled out without success, and clarification was only made much later. Faeser's press office remains approximate, while the minister elegantly deported responsibility for deportation to the federal states.

But not only Afghanistan is the focus! Faeser received a deal with Turkey in September, 500 citizens per week should be returned. The balance? Just 885 deported by a total of October! Despite the formal indication that countries enforce the right of residence, it becomes clear that hardly anything can run here without the federal government. Finally, no scheduled flight is taking a course on Kabul, because larger guns would have to be opened. What is going on in the background of communication between the governments is in the stars, while Faeser used to put their achievements in the foreground.

Faeser's zigzag course: praise, refer, denial

applauded and yet criticizes, according to the Faeser passenger in the political roller coaster! After the Afghanistan flight in August, the minister accepted fame for her success, now she lets the criticism of the countries bounce off. Particularly delicate: The controversial hand money of 1000 euros for returnees, which the federal states are supposed to pay. However, it became clear that the proposal came from a federal office. The federal states are eagerly awaiting solutions and proposals from the federal government for future deportations, because the current standstill raises questions.

is there a migration crisis?

The messages of the Interior Ministry could hardly be more contradictory! "We don't have a big migration crisis," said Faeser's provocative judgment two years ago in the Bundestag. But now the minister, indirectly, has to correct her words. Although the number of asylum applications have dropped and the deportations have increased, the need for these measures speaks a clear language. Faeser emphasizes their successes while the facts are independent: smugglers were set, illegal entry was prevented. Whether this is actually a success balance remains interpretable, but it harbors a thread after taste of the complacency.