Police confesses: In the act everything went wrong!

Police confesses: In the act everything went wrong!

In the current trial of a 32-year-old police officer in Linz, who is charged with abuse of office, there are crucial elements in the room. The accused is said to have deliberately withheld relevant documents to the public prosecutor, including an important official note and interrogation of witnesses. This led to an arson for arson against a colleague. Surprising evidence photos presented to the investigators refuted the original theory, which called a fallen lamp as the cause of the fire, which revived the process, such as the Kleine Zeitung reported.

confession and consequences

In the process, the accused said guilty and explained that everything went wrong when processing the case. He spoke of a "blackout" and admitted that he had hastily and incompletely submitted his report. His defender advocated a diversional settlement because this was a unique slip. However, the prosecutor replied that it was a serious offense that endangers the integrity of law enforcement. He rejected that a diversion could be considered because the entire public prosecutor's office was led to the wrong track.

Another central topic in such procedures is the right to inspect files. As explained es-law.at , this insight enables the accused and his lawyer to examine all evidence and documents that are available against them. This is crucial to understand the evidence and, if necessary, uncover gaps in the investigation. The constitutionally protected right to inspect files is essential for a fair defense, especially in criminal proceedings where every detail can be decisive.