Arbitration court under fire: Hanappi-Egger criticizes league decisions!

Arbitration court under fire: Hanappi-Egger criticizes league decisions!

In a heated dispute over the lock of Rapid-Wien-Torupup Niklas Hedl, vice-president Edeltraud Hanappi-Egger had sharp criticism of the Bundesliga and at the same time demanded that the constant neutral arbitration court. The background is a new lock that was imposed on Austria fans due to a supposedly provocative gesture of Hedls, which triggers great lack of understanding in the club's management. The Rapid Vice President described the decision as questionable and questioned the goalkeeper's credibility. "It is absurd that there is no suspensive effect in the event of an objection," she said in a public statement, as well as the Documented.

Hanappi-Egger also criticized the way of working of Senate 1, which is responsible for the penalty movement. It referred to the fact that decisions are often revised, which causes doubt about the quality of the judgments. "Critical self -reflection would be appropriate," she warned. In her opinion, the Senate, which is characterized by a family closeness to Wiener Austria, shows serious defects in relation to the principles of Good Governance, which is reinforced by the participation of members who are known as Austria supporters. It is essential that the committee of any appearance of bias will remain raised to ensure professionalism in the league, according to Hanappi-Egger, which also in Kurier is discussed in detail.

The Rapid Vice President has given the acceptance of these critical points in the committees in order to achieve a restoration of Hedl's reputation after it has already been finished with a fine, but the possibility of an objection with suspensive effect is intended. This inequality in the regulations also stirs up the frustration with Rapid Vienna and illustrates the imbalance of the decisions within the league.

Details
OrtVienna, Österreich
Quellen

Kommentare (0)