Tikok users glorify amo buyers: a terrifying trend!

Tikok users glorify amo buyers: a terrifying trend!

In the current debate about the Tikok platform, the company is criticized for the romanticization of violence and serious data protection injuries. A few days ago, reports on the glorification of the gunner Arthur A. the public shocked the public. He killed nine students and a teacher in the killing spree in Graz. Users on Tikkok use the platform to represent the alleged perpetrator in a positive light, which comes across broad rejection. The videos, which show the perpetrator in the romantic context and are accompanied by approving comments, cause concerned reactions. It is particularly disturbing that personal information from the perpetrator, including his mother's address, was published in comments. Despite the theoretical guidelines of Tikkok against such content, reports show a low effect, and the number of similar videos grows.

The problem is illustrated by a case in which a reader reported that her report was rejected with regard to data protection. Obviously there are serious failures in monitoring the content and the protection of sensitive data on the platform. Memories of the similar case of the killing spree in Villach are awakened, in which the perpetrator was celebrated as a "national hero", which further heats up the debate about the responsibility of social media.

data protection violations

The difficulties for Tikkok are not limited to the glorification of violence. The Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) has proven the company with a penalty of 345 million euros due to violations of the EU Data Protection Ordinance (GDPR). This punishment particularly affects the uncertain settings of the platform and the poor age review when registering, which questions the safety of the data of minors. The DPC initiated the investigation in September 2021 to evaluate the period from summer until the end of 2020, since Tiktok has its main branch in Ireland and thus falls under European law.

TIKTOK has a large user base in the EU, with over 130 million members. Nevertheless, the company argues that the problems found relating to attitudes that came into force three years ago. The dissatisfaction with the amount of the punishment has prompted Tiktok to consider review of the procedure. The platform is therefore responsible for responsibility: both with regard to the content that is distributed on your side, as well as in dealing with the personal data of your users.

effects on users and society

The incidents related to Tikok raise a critical question about the effects of social media platforms on society. Romanticization of amo runners and other violent people could not only promote dangerous idealizations, but also convey a distorted image of reality and responsibility. Shouldn't companies like Tikok take on a greater responsibility for the content they host? The current situation could serve as a wake -up call for legislators and society as a whole in order to think more intensively about the regulation of social media and the protection of children and adolescents.

The debate about Tikok is important because it not only affects the platform itself, but also has far -reaching implications for dealing with data protection, security and the way violence is positioned in the digital world. Tikok could force the combination of problematic content and legal difficulties.